Measuring position determination for accurate and efficient visual inspection using UAV

Asa, Kotaro; Funabora, Yuki; Doki, Shinji; Doki, Kae

doi:10.1109/sii.2017.8279210

Cited by 2 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The recent breakthroughs in the field of aerial robots has allowed the usage of various multi-rotor platforms (e.g., four-rotor and eight-rotor-based platforms) in the field of SHM, with various implementation focusing towards bridge inspection and maintenance. The majority of the studies for bridge inspection using UAVs rely on visual inspection methods [72][73][74][75][76]. However, some of the recent studies have attempted to explore different ways in which aerial robots can be modified to provide perching and contact-based inspection capabilities [45,78,82,84].…”

Section: Aerial Robotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this platform did not rely on any NDE sensors, as the research is still in its initial stages. Another study focused on the position determination of UAV for the visual inspection of bridges using an on-board camera [76]. This is a relatively new field of research and further research is required in order to fully exploit the flexibility and versatility of aerial robotic platforms towards the accessing and monitoring of different parts of the bridge infrastructures.…”

Section: Aerial Robotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the case of impact-echo-based NDE techniques, metallic objects (e.g., metal chains, ball bearings) are used to create acoustic vibrations and contact sensors are employed to record the reflected sound waves from the different underground materials and the defects within infrastructures. A number of Another study focused on the position determination of UAV for the visual inspection of bridges using an on-board camera [76]. This is a relatively new field of research and further research is required in order to fully exploit the flexibility and versatility of aerial robotic platforms towards the accessing and monitoring of different parts of the bridge infrastructures.…”

Section: Single Sensor Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this section, the primary purpose is to explore the different ways in which sensor fusion techniques can be used for different modalities (discussed in (a) (b) Figure 10. Principles for the GPR wave transmission: (a) wave transmission with the fixed-offset profiling method for data collection, (b) the use of a common midpoint method for data collection using GPR [149,150] with different visual sensors to provide surface-level information to assess the structural health of bridges [72,[74][75][76][77]83,98].…”

Section: Multi-sensor Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…legged robots, wheel-based sliding robots and crawler robots) [38][39][40][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62], and multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (e.g., quad-rotors and octo-rotors) [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] to unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) (e.g., advanced robotics and automation (ARA) lab robot, robotic crack inspection and mapping (ROCIM), robotics-assisted bridge inspection tool (RABIT)) [45,47,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] and water-based robotic crafts (e.g., unmanned submersible vehicles (USVs), underwater marine vehicles (UMVs), underwater vehicles (UUVs)) [41,42,80]. Some of the recent studies have also focused towards developing hybrid robotic frameworks (e.g., wall-climbing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), robots capable of flying and crawling and other multi-rotor flying robots capable of latching on to specific parts of infrastructure that require inspection), which are able to provide multi-functional roles and capabilities for the different types of inspection activities [43,…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Review of Non-Destructive Civil Infrastructure Evaluation for Bridges: State-of-the-Art Robotic Platforms, Sensors and Algorithms

Ahmed

Gucunski

2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of civil infrastructure has been an active area of research in recent decades. The traditional inspection of civil infrastructure mostly relies on visual inspection using human inspectors. To facilitate this process, different sensors for data collection and techniques for data analyses have been used to effectively carry out this task in an automated fashion. This review-based study will examine some of the recent developments in the field of autonomous robotic platforms for NDE and the structural health monitoring (SHM) of bridges. Some of the salient features of this review-based study will be discussed in the light of the existing surveys and reviews that have been published in the recent past, which will enable the clarification regarding the novelty of the present review-based study. The review methodology will be discussed in sufficient depth, which will provide insights regarding some of the primary aspects of the review methodology followed by this review-based study. In order to provide an in-depth examination of the state-of-the-art, the current research will examine the three major research streams. The first stream relates to technological robotic platforms developed for NDE of bridges. The second stream of literature examines myriad sensors used for the development of robotic platforms for the NDE of bridges. The third stream of literature highlights different algorithms for the surface- and sub-surface-level analysis of bridges that have been developed by studies in the past. A number of challenges towards the development of robotic platforms have also been discussed.

show abstract