Measuring physical activity in children and adolescents for dietary surveys: practicalities, problems and pitfalls

Abstract

Physical inactivity is an important risk factor for many chronic diseases and contributes to obesity and poor mental well-being. The present paper describes the main advantages and disadvantages, practical problems, suggested uses, and future developments regarding self-reported and objective data collection in the context of dietary surveys. In dietary surveys, physical activity is measured primarily to estimate energy expenditure. Energy expenditure surveillance is important for tracking changes over time, particularly given the debates over the role of the relative importance of energy intake and expenditure changes in the aetiology of obesity. It is also important to assess the extent of underreporting of dietary intake in these surveys. Physical activity data collected should include details on the frequency, duration and relative intensity of activity for each activity type that contributes considerably to overall activity and energy expenditure. Problems of validity and reliability, associated with inaccurate assessment, recall bias, and social desirability bias, are well-known; children under 10 years cannot report their activities accurately. However, despite such limitations, questionnaires are still the dominant method of physical activity assessment in dietary surveys due to their low cost and relatively low participant burden. Objective, time-stamped measures that monitor heart rate and/or movement can provide more comprehensive, quantitative assessment of physical activity but at greater cost and participant burden. Although overcoming many limitations of questionnaires, objective measures also have drawbacks, including technical, practical and interpretational issues.

Associating Physical Activity Levels with Motor Performance and Physical Function in Childhood Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

“…For example, recall bias is common among children using self-report PA questionnaires. 45 The individual PAQ-C score also limited analysis by not considering PA type, intensity, and duration and seasonal changes in PA, and it lacks established normative data. In addition, the BOT-2 SF does not distinguish between gross and fine motor scores, although differences between them are important to consider in clinical assessments and designing rehabilitation interventions.…”

The influence of a school-based intervention programme regarding adherence to a healthy diet in children and adolescents from disadvantaged areas in Greece: the DIATROFI study

“…Misreporting of food items and other lifestyle characteristics may also be present, due to recall bias and the self-reported nature of the questionnaire—a known drawback in population studies 38 39. Moreover, given the low SES status of the examined population, this problem may be even more intense.…”

Reported provision of analgesia to patients with acute abdominal pain in Canadian paediatric emergency departments

“…23 A plausible explanation for our findings is social desirability bias, a welldescribed phenomenon in survey research. 27 We sought to identify this bias by providing, as one of our three scenarios, a child with abdominal pain rated 4 out of 10. The fact that 23/145 (15.8%) of respondents indicated they would provide intravenous analgesia in a case of relatively mild abdominal pain suggests that social desirability bias may have played a role in participants' responses.…”