New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography 2018
DOI: 10.17125/gov2018.ch29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Performances, Skill and Accuracy in Operational Oceanography: New Challenges and Approaches

Abstract: Operational oceanography is now established in many countries, focusing on global, regional, or coastal areas, and targeting different aspects of the « blue », « white » or « green » ocean processes in order to provide reliable information to users. There are nowadays a large variety of interests and users, with different disciplines and levels of expertise. Validation and verification of operational products and systems are evolving in order to anticipate user's needs, and better quantify the level of confide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where available, the accuracy metric of the variables used for the CRSEI can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Satellite remote sensing data and ocean model data are now regularly available at resolutions of less than 10km [62]. Due to the relative sparseness of global in situ data, the ocean dynamics of some variables are not adequately observed at these fine scales, and, as such, error estimates for marine variables are not always available at a global scale, which is a common challenge for operational oceanography [62].…”
Section: Data Accuracy and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where available, the accuracy metric of the variables used for the CRSEI can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Satellite remote sensing data and ocean model data are now regularly available at resolutions of less than 10km [62]. Due to the relative sparseness of global in situ data, the ocean dynamics of some variables are not adequately observed at these fine scales, and, as such, error estimates for marine variables are not always available at a global scale, which is a common challenge for operational oceanography [62].…”
Section: Data Accuracy and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementarily, HFR systems play a primary role in multi-model comparison in overlapping regions since they help in judging the strengths and weaknesses of each forecasting system in the modeling of key ocean processes and also to deepen the understanding of discrepancies in model predictions. With CMEMS regional models special emphasis has been placed on the use of HFR measurements in the intercomparison of regional models against nested coastal model solutions in order to elucidate the added value of dynamical downscaling approaches (Hernandez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Ocean Model Validation and Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification of ocean predictions has gradually evolved using metrics (Crosnier et al, 2006), defined as sets of diagnostics that compute scalar measures from ocean forecasting systems outcomes, providing not only objective quality indicators that can be quantitatively compared but also uncertainty estimates and error levels (Hernandez et al, 2015). These metrics allow for evaluation of the accuracy of ocean estimates, the forecast skill, and the reliability for use in services (Hernandez et al, 2009(Hernandez et al, , 2018. The metrics also establish if and how a new change in the model, data assimilation scheme or system setup has contributed to a better result and allow an ongoing monitoring of the quality of forecasts.…”
Section: Ocean Prediction Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%