Measuring Penultimate Against Ultimate Reality: an Investigation of the Integrity and Argumentation of 2 Corinthians

deSilva, David A.

doi:10.1177/0142064x9301605203

Journal for the Study of the New Testament

1993

DOI: 10.1177/0142064x9301605203

|View full text |Cite

Measuring Penultimate Against Ultimate Reality: an Investigation of the Integrity and Argumentation of 2 Corinthians

David A. deSilva¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 8. Scholars who reject the identiﬁcation of chs. 10–13 with the letter of tears (besides those who see 2 Corinthians as a uniﬁed letter) include the following: Windisch 1970: 14, 17-18; Furnish 1984: 37-38; DeSilva 1993: 41-42 n. 3; Thrall 1994: 15-20; Quesnel 1997: 262; Becker 2002: 96-98; Murphy-O’Connor 2010: 151-59, 163; Quesnel 1997: 262. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

No Bridge over Troubled Water? The Gap between 2 Corinthians 1–9 and 10–13 Revisited

Schmeller

2013

Journal for the Study of the New Testament

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

2 Corinthians 1–9 and 10–13 are often regarded as two different letters. The arguments usually forwarded in support of this view are observations about the personal relationship between Paul and the Corinthians or about the circumstances reflected in the two parts of the letter. A close examination of the text reveals clear hints of a change in the personal relationship, but we do not ﬁnd corresponding hints of a change of circumstances. This article suggests that one can account for continuity on the situational level and for discontinuity in the relationship between Paul and the Corinthians on the grounds that both parts of the letter have different aims. Chapters 1–9 and 10–13 do not contradict each other but are complementary. Thus 2 Corinthians can be viewed as an original unity.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 10. So, e.g., Furnish 1984: 38; Martin 1986: xlv; DeSilva 1993: 41-42 n. 3; Wünsch 1996: 114-15. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

No Bridge over Troubled Water? The Gap between 2 Corinthians 1–9 and 10–13 Revisited

Schmeller

2013

Journal for the Study of the New Testament

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Measuring Penultimate Against Ultimate Reality: an Investigation of the Integrity and Argumentation of 2 Corinthians

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

No Bridge over Troubled Water? The Gap between 2 Corinthians 1–9 and 10–13 Revisited

No Bridge over Troubled Water? The Gap between 2 Corinthians 1–9 and 10–13 Revisited

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About