Measuring Patient Satisfaction in a Cardiology Service Using Associative Maps. A New Method

Consuegra-Sánchez, Luciano; Martínez, José Antonio; Costa, Ángela Fernández; Arcos, Federico Soria; Castillo-Moreno, Juan A.

doi:10.1016/j.rec.2018.06.008

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…18 From non-urological literature, Consuegra-Sanchez et al proposed "associative mapping" in which an aggregate map composed of individual responses to an open-ended survey was used to better illustrate larger themes that contributed to patient satisfaction in cardiology patients. 19 In our study, we focused on patient experiences during the pre and perioperative period with less emphasis on long-term QOL measures. We employed a single generic question to provide a very basic assessment of overall patient satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Satisfaction with Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer at a Single Institution: How Can We Improve?</p>

Hockman

Bailey

Sanders

et al. 2020

RRU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate patient satisfaction (with emphasis on preoperative education) with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at our institution, the University of Missouri Hospital, qualitatively in order to identify specific areas where improvements can be made. Materials and Methods: We developed a patient survey that used open-ended questions to identify positive and negative experiences that contributed to patient satisfaction. We administered the survey to radical cystectomy patients who met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. We recorded, transcribed and qualitatively coded the responses. We identified four themes under which both positive and negative responses were placed, and constructed two diagrams to better illustrate contributors to patient experience and satisfaction. Results: We identified 25 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of those, 13 participated in the survey. Regarding overall experience, 92.3% of patients rated their care as excellent or good. Regarding preoperative education, 76.9% of patients reported they definitely or somewhat received enough information on what to expect after surgery, and 76.9% definitely received enough guidance on how to care for themselves after surgery. From qualitative coding of patient responses to open-ended questions, we identified preoperative preparation, delivery of care, caregiver availability, and patient-centered care as themes that contributed positively and negatively to patient experience. Conclusion: Although the overall patient satisfaction could be perceived as high (92.3%), qualitative analysis revealed several areas where improvements can be made to improve patient experience with radical cystectomy at our institution. As previously expected, preoperative preparation was a contributor.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%