Measuring participation for persons with mental illness: A systematic review assessing relevance of existing scales for low and middle income countries

Abstract

BackgroundParticipation is increasingly becoming an important outcome for assessment in many fields, including development, disability and policy implementation. However, selecting specific instruments to measure participation has been a significant problem due to overlapping conceptual definitions and use of different theories. The objective of this paper is to identify participation instruments, examine theories/definition supporting their use and highlight scales for use in low and middle-income countries for persons with mental illness.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify instruments intended to measure participation for individuals with severe mental illness. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2003 and 2014. Instruments that measured related concepts of well-being, quality of life and social functioning were also identified and screened for items that pertained to participation, defined as empowerment and collective capabilities.ResultsFive scales met established criteria for assessing participation and were determined to contain questions measuring empowerment and/or collective capabilities. However, each scale largely assessed individual functioning and capacity, while neglecting collective aspects of the community. All scales were developed in high-income countries and none were used in low and middle-income countries.ConclusionsThere is an urgent need for participation scales to focus on empowerment as well as collective capabilities. Further, development of participation scales should clearly delineate theoretical foundations and concepts used. Finally, participation scales used in low and middle income countries should consider how contextual factors like medicine, poverty and disability, particularly with regards to mental illness, impact content of the scale.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0093-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Promoting Recovery in Mental Illness: The Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers, and Community Members in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

“…People with severe mental illness present with numerous difficulties in their social functioning. Patients with mental disorders such as bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and depressive disorders are at increased risk of delayed recovery [16,17]. The reasons for this are reported to be a lack of energy and motivation to engage in community activities, as a result of the mental disorder, side effects of psychotropic medications, and prolonged hospitalization [18].…”

Creating an inclusive mall environment with the PRECEDE-PROCEED model: a living lab case study

“…As a final caveat, it is important to underscore that such a project is suited to high resource environments and may not be feasible in resource-deprived environments, such as locations within lowand middle-income countries. [48] In summary, this paper demonstrates the applicability of the PPM as a framework for the development of an enabling and inclusive environment in a renovation-ready shopping mall in Canada's second largest city. Since design exclusion tends to occur early in the design process, it may be worthwhile and practical to consider issues of inclusivity earlier in the design process of new shopping malls.…”

Testing ActiveYou II: Applying Cognitive Interviews in Improving Item Quality and Applicability of a Web-Based, Self-Report Instrument on Participation in Children with Disabilities

“…Participants in the cognitive interviews were nine children within the target-group recruited from a rehabilitation center in Norway. The inclusion criteria were (1) school age (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), (2) ability to give informed consent, and (3) having the ability to understand and to communicate verbally and participate actively in the interviews in Norwegian. Thus, children with moderate/severe intellectual disability were excluded.…”

“…This is grounded in an understanding of the positive effects of participation in leisure activities for the physical, emotional, and social development of children and their general well-being [4][5][6]. Valid and reliable instruments are needed to gain an increased understanding and knowledge of the participation patterns in leisure activities shown by children with disabilities and for planning and evaluating interventions [6,7]. In their systematic review, Adair et al [6] argued that measures continually need to be adapted to be in accordance with the developing understanding of the participation construct.…”