2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed1702_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Parental Meta-Emotion: Psychometric Properties of the Emotion-Related Parenting Styles Self-Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…By replacing references to “my child” with “a child” or “one of the children in my class,” we developed the Teacher Emotion Socialization Self-Test (TESST) based on the Emotion-Related Parenting Styles Self-Test Likert version (ERPSST-Likert; Hakim-Larson, Parker, Lee, Goodwin, & Voelker, 2006). The TESST consists of 81 Likert-type statements and the teachers responded by indicating their level of agreement with each statement, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Teacher Measures: Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By replacing references to “my child” with “a child” or “one of the children in my class,” we developed the Teacher Emotion Socialization Self-Test (TESST) based on the Emotion-Related Parenting Styles Self-Test Likert version (ERPSST-Likert; Hakim-Larson, Parker, Lee, Goodwin, & Voelker, 2006). The TESST consists of 81 Likert-type statements and the teachers responded by indicating their level of agreement with each statement, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Teacher Measures: Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four subscales were generated, representing four emotion socialization styles: Dismissing, Disapproving, Laissez-Faire, and Emotion-Coaching styles; higher scores indicate higher levels of endorsement of that emotion socialization style. Hakim-Larson and colleagues (2006) reported reliability coefficients for the ERPSST-Likert scales of .72 for Dismissing, .91 for Disapproving, .72 for Laissez-faire, and .82 for Emotion-Coaching. Only the data from the 23-item Emotion-Coaching subscale (α = .83) was included in the analyses for the current study, as it most closely relates to the Teaching aspect of emotion socialization.…”
Section: Teacher Measures: Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent empirical work suggests that the meta-emotion construct combines two dimensions: belief about acceptability of emotions, and belief about active emotion socialization (Hakim-Larson, Parker, Lee, Goodwin, & Voelker, 2006). When the belief about whether negative emotions are acceptable is disaggregated from active emotion coaching, each has differentiated influence on children’s outcomes.…”
Section: Parents’ Beliefs About Children’s Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our research, mothers and fathers completed the Meta-Emotion Structure Questionnaire. Similarly, as Hakim-Larson, Parker, Lee, Goodwin, and Voelker (2006) in their research, we also started from a self-report version of the meta-emotion interview introduced in a parenting guidebook (Gottman, 1997 self-assessment questionnaire designed to measure parents' emotional style, and results from the study indicated a twofactor scale for the maternal emotional styles questionnaire, emotion coaching and emotion dismissing. On the other hand, Paterson and collaborators (2012) obtained different factorial structures of the parental meta-emotion dimension depending on whether these were typically developing children or children with developmental disabilities (emotion coaching, parental acceptance of negative emotion, and parental rejection of negative emotion and in subsample feelings of uncertainty/ineffectiveness in emotion socialisation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%