Measuring obesity in the absence of a gold standard

Abstract

Measuring Obesity in the Absence of a Gold Standard * Reliable measures of body composition are essential in order to develop effective policies to tackle the costs of obesity. To date the lack of an acceptable gold-standard for measuring fatness has made it difficult to evaluate alternative measures of obesity. In this paper we draw on work in other areas of epidemiology and use latent class analysis to evaluate alternative measures of obesity in the absence of a gold standard. Using data from a representative sample of US adults we show that while measures based on Body Mass Index and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis appear to misclassify large numbers of individuals, this is not the case for classification based on waist circumference. The error rates associated with waist circumference are of the order of 3% for most of our samples compared to error rates as high as 40-50% with the other measures. These results have implications for racial differences in obesity. Our estimated true prevalence rates imply that the obesity rate among black women is substantially higher than among white women. However, the opposite is true for men, with the black men having a significantly lower obesity rate among black men. The fact that neither the BMI nor the BIA based measures of obesity are capable of capturing both these features highlights the dangers associated with measuring obesity and the potential costly policy mistakes that may arise from arbitrarily adopting a single measure as a gold standard. JEL Classification:I18, C38

Reporting error in weight and its implications for bias in economic models

“…The results of this paper offer additional support for calls for social science datasets to include measurements of weight and height as well as of more direct and accurate measures of fatness (e.g. O'Neill, 2015).…”

The medical care costs of obesity and severe obesity in youth: An instrumental variables approach

“…In future research, focusing on utilization counts as opposed to medical expenditures may allow us to better identify the specific treatments responsible for elevated medical care costs among youths with obesity. Fourth, BMI is an imperfect measure of fatness (Burkhauser and Cawley, 2008;O'Neill, 2015). Ideally, we would have more accurate measures of fatness such as percent body fat, but BMI is the only measure of obesity available in the MEPS.…”

Comparative assessment of methods for determining adiposity and a model for obesity index

“…The gold standard in diagnosing obesity as well as the relationship between the different measures of obesity and other chronic diseases remains debatable. Studies within Mexican and Caucasians population have reported that prevalence of obesity in their study population differ depending on whether the classification was done with BMI or %BF [18, 19]. In a study among Australia women they showed that waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio were better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk than BMI [20] whereas in a Nigerian population study, BMI in addition to both waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio were excellent predictors of cardiovascular risk [16].…”