2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring mixing patterns in complex networks by Spearman rank correlation coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Spearman coefficient is usually used to quantify how well two columns of data monotonically depend on each other, meaning the coefficient determines the degree to which each of the variables is correlated with the factor that is common to all variables in the analysis [63,64], i.e., the correlation study indicates the relationship between two monotonic variables. The resultant values will always be between +1 and −1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spearman coefficient is usually used to quantify how well two columns of data monotonically depend on each other, meaning the coefficient determines the degree to which each of the variables is correlated with the factor that is common to all variables in the analysis [63,64], i.e., the correlation study indicates the relationship between two monotonic variables. The resultant values will always be between +1 and −1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, however, makes it difficult to calculate analytically ρ even for a deterministic network such as the (u, v)-flower. An alternative way of ranking is to rank degrees of 2M end nodes in ascending order with assigning the average rank of degenerated degrees to them [27]. In this case, the rank of an end node with degree k is given by…”
Section: B Maximally Disassortative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the Pearson correlation coefficient, Spearman's uses ranks instead of a single value in order to assess the monotonic relationship between two ranks. 40,41 SRCC was calculated for each participant for each question to check the variability in their answers compared…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%