The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0754-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Mental Wellbeing Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
56
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The scales that have been designed to measure positive mental health and used in previous studies have often based their indicators on concepts such as resilience, self-esteem, selfefficacy, optimism, life satisfaction, hopefulness, perceptions and judgement about sense of coherence, meaning in life, and social integration (Barry, 2009). A recent systematic review of instruments measuring mental well-being among adolescents found 11 instruments in studies published 1998-2016 that fitted their inclusion criteria, which included at least one item assessing feeling and one item assessing functioning (Rose et al, 2017). WEMWBS was one of the scales that was found to be acceptable for use among adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scales that have been designed to measure positive mental health and used in previous studies have often based their indicators on concepts such as resilience, self-esteem, selfefficacy, optimism, life satisfaction, hopefulness, perceptions and judgement about sense of coherence, meaning in life, and social integration (Barry, 2009). A recent systematic review of instruments measuring mental well-being among adolescents found 11 instruments in studies published 1998-2016 that fitted their inclusion criteria, which included at least one item assessing feeling and one item assessing functioning (Rose et al, 2017). WEMWBS was one of the scales that was found to be acceptable for use among adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A database on 464 positive health indicators has been developed by the Department of Health Promotion at Bergen University (Rullesta, Kvissellien & Servan, 2017). In our selection of high-quality indicators, it is important to consider the content, carefully including positively worded items and ensuring alignment with the mental health framework (Rose et al, 2017). Moreover, the conceptual relevance for youth is essential, including psychometric properties (particularly valid for youth).…”
Section: Development Of Adolescent Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, mental wellbeing is defined as a positive mental state where individuals can thrive and flourish (Clarke et al, 2011;WHO, 2004). Currently, both positive and negative aspects are often integrated in the definition of mental health, either with mental health problems at one end of a continuum and wellbeing at the other end (Greenspoon & Saklofske, 2001;Rose et al, 2017), or they can be seen as different dimensions. In the current study we rely on the latter conceptualization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have examined mental health problems in adolescence and the risk factors for developing such problems (Suldo & Shaffer-Hudkins, 2008). However, fewer studies have examined mental wellbeing in this population (Clarke et al, 2011;Patalay & Fitzsimons, 2016;Rose et al, 2017), and there is still a lack of evidence concerning the predictors of mental wellbeing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…social support, belonging, purpose in life, self-acceptance). These PWB scales have shown good validity among adolescent populations in the North [146]. In addition, the Mental Health Continuum Short-Form has shown strong alignment with conceptualisation of a good life among adolescents in South Africa [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%