Abstract:Luxury brand consumption by female consumers in the rich Arab Gulf states has never been systematically studied, and thus most of our knowledge in this area remains shaped by preconceived notions that are not likely to withstand scientific scrutiny. This study fills that gap in research and provides significant evidence on the actual consumption behavior of this enigmatic consumer segment. In our study, focus groups and expert feedback were used to construct a Luxury Consumption Scale (LCS) to measure actual l… Show more
“…Studies indicated that consumers have different materialistic values and as previously mentioned, several studies have found that religion does not produce negative effects on luxury consumption (Alserhan et al, ; Arli et al, ). In contrast, other studies confirmed that religion has significant effects on luxury consumption (Al‐Hyari et al, ; Burroughs & Rindfleisch, ).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous studies investigated this issue (see Bakar, Lee, & Hazarina Hashim, ; La Barbera & Gürhan, ; Pace, ), but the results were inconsistent. Recent studies found that religion does not have a negative effect on luxury consumption (Alserhan, Bataineh, Halkias, & Komodromos, ; Arli, Cherrier, & Tjiptono, ; Dekhil, Boulebech, & Bouslama, ; Teimourpour & Heidarzadeh Hanzaee, ). In contrast, prior studies found that religion has a significant effect on luxury consumption.…”
Religion has always rejected the concept of materialism and urged people to live in simplicity and moderation. Nonetheless, reality reveals a different phenomenon. Studies on religion and materialism have found inconsistent results. We examine the effect of religion on materialism and affective attitudes towards luxury goods and the mediating effect of materialism on affective attitude towards luxury goods. We propose the idea that many religious people reject the concept of materialism, but they consider luxury goods consumption compatible with their religious beliefs. 355 university students show that youth consumers with high intrinsic religiosity possess an affective attitude towards luxury goods. The results show that consumers perceived materialism and luxury goods as two separate constructs. Religious consumers reject the concept of materialism as an attachment to worldly possessions, but they maintain their emotional affection towards luxury goods. The results have several implications for both business and religious leaders. First, from a business perspective, there are no significant differences between religious and nonreligious youth consumers, especially in their acceptance of luxury goods. Simply put, religious youth consumers love God, but they also love Gucci (i.e., luxury goods). On the other hand, if religious leaders are teaching their congregations to reject materialism, they may need to shift the focus of their teaching from materialism to the role of luxury goods in their lives and how the purchase and ownership of luxury items may not reflect the true values of their beliefs.
“…Studies indicated that consumers have different materialistic values and as previously mentioned, several studies have found that religion does not produce negative effects on luxury consumption (Alserhan et al, ; Arli et al, ). In contrast, other studies confirmed that religion has significant effects on luxury consumption (Al‐Hyari et al, ; Burroughs & Rindfleisch, ).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous studies investigated this issue (see Bakar, Lee, & Hazarina Hashim, ; La Barbera & Gürhan, ; Pace, ), but the results were inconsistent. Recent studies found that religion does not have a negative effect on luxury consumption (Alserhan, Bataineh, Halkias, & Komodromos, ; Arli, Cherrier, & Tjiptono, ; Dekhil, Boulebech, & Bouslama, ; Teimourpour & Heidarzadeh Hanzaee, ). In contrast, prior studies found that religion has a significant effect on luxury consumption.…”
Religion has always rejected the concept of materialism and urged people to live in simplicity and moderation. Nonetheless, reality reveals a different phenomenon. Studies on religion and materialism have found inconsistent results. We examine the effect of religion on materialism and affective attitudes towards luxury goods and the mediating effect of materialism on affective attitude towards luxury goods. We propose the idea that many religious people reject the concept of materialism, but they consider luxury goods consumption compatible with their religious beliefs. 355 university students show that youth consumers with high intrinsic religiosity possess an affective attitude towards luxury goods. The results show that consumers perceived materialism and luxury goods as two separate constructs. Religious consumers reject the concept of materialism as an attachment to worldly possessions, but they maintain their emotional affection towards luxury goods. The results have several implications for both business and religious leaders. First, from a business perspective, there are no significant differences between religious and nonreligious youth consumers, especially in their acceptance of luxury goods. Simply put, religious youth consumers love God, but they also love Gucci (i.e., luxury goods). On the other hand, if religious leaders are teaching their congregations to reject materialism, they may need to shift the focus of their teaching from materialism to the role of luxury goods in their lives and how the purchase and ownership of luxury items may not reflect the true values of their beliefs.
“…Saudis are the greatest luxury admirers with social, hedonic and functional components playing a critical role in evaluating value. High levels of these factors can be explained by a general Muslim perception of consumption as a key element of identity formation (Alserhan, 2014). Buying luxury goods builds a positive social image showing a high material status (Tjahjono, 2011, Teimourpour & Hanzaee, 2014.…”
Objective: to investigate whether Millennials are internally consistent and distinguished cohort in terms of the perception of luxury
Methodology: mixed: the international e-survey results, conducted in 5 different countries (Poland, Portugal, Turkey, Germany and Saudi Arabia, 1193 responses) and 4 FGI, conducted in the groups of younger and older Millennials in Poland and Portugal.
Findings: Millennials demonstrate strong country–specific differences in evaluating luxury value drivers; from avowed hedonic status-seekers (mainly Saudi Arabians), through moderately enthusiastic luxury products admirers (Portuguese, Turkish, Polish) to stand-outs, individualists who contest the overall CVPL as represented mostly by Germans. The evaluation of luxury is not cohort specific but rather a matter of the family and material status strengthened by socio-cultural pressure.
Value Added: Global consumption behavioral patterns regarding luxury are permeated by local cultural influences, but are not global cohorts’ specific, due to their internal cultural, age, income and family status diversity.
Recommendations: Communication strategies in a luxury sector should be adjusted more to the country-specific and less to the specific needs of global cohorts.
“…The fact that Arab women living in the GCC region perceived brands as less important vehicles for self-expression than women in all other countries is interesting indeed when considering how much they spend on brands and the sheer size of the market, which is expected to reach a value of nearly 2.9 billion USD in the year 2015 in the UAE alone (Euromonitor International, 2010). Moreover, and according to the same report from Euromonitor International, the GCC market is characterized as a "label me" one, where the person becomes the sum of the brands possessed (Alserhan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if respondents reported that brands are less important for self-expression, how come they spend so much to acquire them? Why do they converse so much about the brands they own and the places they acquired them from (Alserhan et al, 2014)? Did respondents report the ideal, not the factual?…”
Purpose -This paper aims to extend Wallström et al.'s (2010) six-nation study on brand use and notions of self-expression to Arab women in the UAE. Additionally, it extends the scope of investigation to include an extensive qualitative data corpus to inform and explain the consumption practices of this large, very wealthy and under-researched sector of the global marketplace. Design/methodology/approach -The paper uses mixed methodology emphasizing qualitative research as a means of building on the results of Wallström et al.'s (2010) quantitative study. Findings -Results reveal that Arab women are less committed to the idea that beauty care products are a locus of self-expression, and their purchase choices are based on perceived quality of care products, scene of use and their lack of value in the culture as vehicles of conspicuous consumption cues. Originality/value -The paper offers valuable insights to researchers and practitioners into the use of beauty care products as a means of self-expression, and emphasizes the value of word-of-mouth communication in enhancing reach in this category. The authors recommend the investigation of relationships between expressing self through brands and variables revealed in this study such as respondents' relationships to religiosity and health concerns. An extension of this research is also recommended to produce a cross-cultural body of literature on women's self-expression through brands and how the variable of self-expression can be an important driver of consumer preferences and choices in this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.