tients with chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis. [4][5][6][7] Other The hepatic metabolism of lidocaine (1 mg/kg intravestudies have speculated that the test could replace histology nously) to its metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. [8][9][10] However, in addition to the (MEG-X) is the basis of the standard MEG-X test. To retest's diagnostic value, its side effects must be considered. duce the lidocaine-induced side effects, we evaluated the The majority of authors have reported a low preva-MEG-X formation after 0.5 and 1 mg/kg lidocaine intravelence. 3,4,8,10,11 Only one study reported side effects in almost nously in subjects with normal (n Å 5) and severely imall tested individuals. 9 Surprisingly, the symptoms following paired liver function (n Å 7) (study I). From this study, lidocaine injection were not related to the degree of hepatic a low-dose test (MEG-X concentration 30 minutes after histological changes or to the Child class. 9 Because of these 50 mg lidocaine intravenously [MEG-X 30min ] normalized contradictory findings, the safety of the MEG-X test has been to standard MEG-X test results) was developed. Sensory questioned, and further studies were recommended. 12,13 Most side effects from this low dose and from the standard lidocaine-induced side effects are dose-dependent. In con-MEG-X test were compared in a double-blind, randomtrast, lidocaine clearance and the MEG-X formation rate are ized, cross-over study (study II) comprising 15 individudose-independent. 14 To date, it has not been evaluated als with normal liver function and 45 patients with cirwhether this first-order kinetic model holds true for patients rhosis (15 Child A, 15 Child B, and 15 Child C). In study I, with advanced cirrhosis. If this were the case, it should be MEG-X formation rate was dose-independent in patients possible to reduce side effects by extrapolating MEG-X values with severely impaired liver function. In study II, norobtained with lower lidocaine doses to standard MEG-X test malized MEG-X test results (ranging from°4 to 120 mg/ results. Therefore, we studied (study I) the dose-dependent L) were virtually identical to the standard test results pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in patients with severely im-(mean difference: 01.9 mg/L; 95% confidence interval paired liver function. In a second double-blind randomized [CI]: 05.3; 1.5 mg/L). Fewer individuals experienced side controlled study (study II), we assessed the sensory quality effects (30% vs. 53%) with the low-dose test (P Å .0013).and intensity of patients' side effects with the aim of finding In a multivariate analysis, the Child-Pugh score was intheir relationship to lidocaine dosage and liver function. and 0.5 mg/kg body weight to individuals with normal (n Å 5) and severely impaired liver function (n Å 7). To compare the low-dose versus the standard MEG-X test (study II: double-blind, randomized, Lidocaine is metabolized to its principal metabolite, monocross-over design), we injected 1 mg/kg body weight lidocaine and 50 ...