2018
DOI: 10.4135/9781526436962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Juvenile Crime to Compare Trends Among U.S. States: Secondary Data Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social scientists of all stripes recognize the value of quality instrumentation and measurement. Criminologists are intimately familiar with these challenges as the key sources of data—official records and self-report surveys—used to examine the dependent variables in the field are subject to a variety of well-documented limitations (Eterno et al, 2016; Mosher et al, 2010; Piquero et al, 2014; Pyrooz et al, 2019; Tcherni-Buzzeo, 2018). However, nearly all criminologists agree that homicide is the most reliable and valid type of crime measured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social scientists of all stripes recognize the value of quality instrumentation and measurement. Criminologists are intimately familiar with these challenges as the key sources of data—official records and self-report surveys—used to examine the dependent variables in the field are subject to a variety of well-documented limitations (Eterno et al, 2016; Mosher et al, 2010; Piquero et al, 2014; Pyrooz et al, 2019; Tcherni-Buzzeo, 2018). However, nearly all criminologists agree that homicide is the most reliable and valid type of crime measured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%