1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48736-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Intra-Assay Agreement for the Ames Salmonella Assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that the average intra-laboratory reproducibility of a series of Ames test data from the National Toxicological Program (NTP) was determined to be 85% [35], hence it is unclear what an accuracy of 90% [25] might mean and our best result is close to the experimental accuracy of the test.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It should also be noted that the average intra-laboratory reproducibility of a series of Ames test data from the National Toxicological Program (NTP) was determined to be 85% [35], hence it is unclear what an accuracy of 90% [25] might mean and our best result is close to the experimental accuracy of the test.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Validation studies were performed with a number of in vitro and in vivo tests (4,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). One aspect of test system development and validation was the development ot statistical procedures and approaches for determining the acceptability ofthe test data and for evaluating the test data (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Assay Selection and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific distinct mutations in the histidine and tryptophan synthetic pathways of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli have been created respectively, that result in the requirement for an exogenous supply of those amino acids for growth. Using genetically bacterial strains, the Ames test produces a high rate of inter-laboratory reproducibility (85%-90%) [40]. This assay has been proved to be the most predictive in vitro assay for rodent and human carcinogenicity [37,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%