2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2560-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring impulsivity in mice: the five-choice serial reaction time task

Abstract: The 5CSRTT has proven to be a useful tool to investigate impulsivity in mice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These two test conditions challenge the performance of The influence of test experience and NK1 receptor antagonists on the performance of NK1R-/-and wild type mice in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction-Time Task mice in the 5-CSRTT in different ways (Humby et al, 2005;Patel et al, 2006;Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012). In particular, in the VITI, it is not possible to predict when the light cue will appear after trial initiation, and so this test avoids the potential confound of animals using interval-timing to prompt their responses, which is thought to occur with the LITI (Praamstra et al, 2006;Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012). Because these two test conditions seem to reveal different performance deficits (Yan et al, 2011), we thought it advisable to test mice under both conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two test conditions challenge the performance of The influence of test experience and NK1 receptor antagonists on the performance of NK1R-/-and wild type mice in the 5-Choice Serial Reaction-Time Task mice in the 5-CSRTT in different ways (Humby et al, 2005;Patel et al, 2006;Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012). In particular, in the VITI, it is not possible to predict when the light cue will appear after trial initiation, and so this test avoids the potential confound of animals using interval-timing to prompt their responses, which is thought to occur with the LITI (Praamstra et al, 2006;Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012). Because these two test conditions seem to reveal different performance deficits (Yan et al, 2011), we thought it advisable to test mice under both conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance decrements can occur for a number of reasons so other variables were carefully considered to determine the likely reason for reduced accuracy. We found that the number of omissions increased when accuracy decreased during the variable signal durations on the 5CSRTT, which was also found by Fletcher et al (2007) and has been reported in mice (Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012). Both the response latency and reward latency were unchanged in the 5CSRTT across the session indicating variable stimulus durations do not alter response speed, which is also in agreement with the literature (Fletcher et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although the SAT results in far fewer omission responses than the 5CSRTT and 5C-CPT, the application of this task to mice has been challenging (Martin et al, 2006;St Peters et al, 2011a). However, mice have been used in both the 5CSRTT and 5C-CPT (Young et al, 2009b;Harms et al, 2012;Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012). With a focus on translational testing, it is important to acknowledge that each of these protocols have similarities and differences when compared to human CPT testing.…”
Section: Rodent Tasks 151 Current Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing of performance followed the protocol previously described (Pena-Oliver et al, 2012; see Supplementary Methods). In brief, following training under fITI conditions, mice were tested under vITI (2, 5, 10, 15 s) conditions to increase premature responding (Robbins, 2002;Sanchez-Roige et al, 2012).…”
Section: Mouse Studymentioning
confidence: 99%