2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring implementation of medication optimization services: Development and validation of an implementation outcomes questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surveys included demographic questions, the Implementation Outcomes Questionnaire (IOQ) scales to measure acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, 18 a service satisfaction survey, 19 and an adapted version of the Behavioral Intent to Use measure to assess intent to sustain use of the service 20 . These surveys were collected toward the end of the study from the lead pharmacists, pharmacy managers, and clinic team members who were involved in the implementation phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surveys included demographic questions, the Implementation Outcomes Questionnaire (IOQ) scales to measure acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, 18 a service satisfaction survey, 19 and an adapted version of the Behavioral Intent to Use measure to assess intent to sustain use of the service 20 . These surveys were collected toward the end of the study from the lead pharmacists, pharmacy managers, and clinic team members who were involved in the implementation phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information sources for this study included administrative data, surveys, interviews, and MTP data. Table 1 [18][19][20] provides a detailed overview of the data collection methodology and timeline. In summary, clinic enrollment study records (e.g., clinic enrollment logs) were used to assess service adoption.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed methods data reported in this manuscript span the first 3 months of service implementation, and are part of a broader effectiveness‐implementation hybrid type 2 study 20 . Table 1 21,22 describes and aligns the aims of the study, the data types and sources, data indicators, and data collection details. In summary, to identify successes, challenges, and lessons learned thus far (Aim 1), qualitative data were gathered through interviews with clinic champions (N = 6), open‐ended survey questions with clinic staff and providers (N = 18), and pharmacists' logs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clinic Survey , collected from the clinic champions, providers, and staff (N = 22), quantitatively assessed service acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and intent to maintain use as indicators of implementation success. The Survey details (ie, number of items, response scale, cited references for psychometric properties) can be found in Table 1 21,22 . Finally, MTPs , collected through an online MTP documentation tool used by the pharmacists as part of service delivery, were used as a proxy to assess the preliminary effectiveness of the CMM telepharmacy service 23,24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contudo, ainda falta padronização na definição e utilização desses indicadores de forma a possibilitar a comparação entre os processos de implementação, bem como verificar a qualidade do serviço prestado 27,28 .…”
Section: Planejamento Do Serviçounclassified