2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291707001638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring ideas of persecution and social reference: the Greenet al. Paranoid Thought Scales (GPTS)

Abstract: A reliable and valid tool for assessing paranoid thoughts is presented. It will provide an effective way for researchers to ensure consistency in research and for clinicians to assess change with treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
344
5
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
12
344
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The high paranoid group in our sample included a range of scores from 20 to 73, with some of the scores reaching levels that are reported in clinical groups (Green et al, 2008). However, it is normal for non-clinical samples to have some overlap with clinical samples (Green et al, 2008).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high paranoid group in our sample included a range of scores from 20 to 73, with some of the scores reaching levels that are reported in clinical groups (Green et al, 2008). However, it is normal for non-clinical samples to have some overlap with clinical samples (Green et al, 2008).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Subjects with paranoia scores at the 75th percentile or above were classed as the 'high paranoid' group and those below the 75th percentile as the 'low-paranoid' group (methodology adopted from Stopa and Clark, 2001). The high paranoid group in our sample included a range of scores from 20 to 73, with some of the scores reaching levels that are reported in clinical groups (Green et al, 2008). However, it is normal for non-clinical samples to have some overlap with clinical samples (Green et al, 2008).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of the GPTS is that it captures paranoia severity across the spectrum: people with delusions of persecution were found to score significantly more highly than non-clinical controls, but with overlap between the distributions, and widely ranging scores in each (32-149 in the non-clinical group; 32-160 in the delusions group). In those with persecutory delusions, subscale scores also showed appropriate associations with corresponding item scores on the PSYRATS interviewer-rated delusions scale (Haddock et al, 1999), and clinical change over six months from baseline assessment was captured by changes in scores that correlated significantly with PSYRATS change scores (Green et al, 2008). Beck et al, 1996).…”
Section: Clinical Symptom Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The items were delusional conviction, delusional distress, the degree of effort used to avoid thinking about the belief, and the degree of success in avoiding thoughts about the belief. Green et al Paranoid Thoughts Scale (GPTS;Green et al, 2008). The GPTS is a 32-item self-report measure of paranoid thoughts over the last month, split into two parts.…”
Section: Clinical Symptom Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSQ is divided into five subscales based on factor analytic findings; these subscales are labeled as Interpersonal Suspiciousness/Hostility, Negative Mood/Withdrawal, Anger/Impulsiveness, Mistrust/Wariness, and Perceived Hardship/Resentment (Rawlings et al, 1996). The PSQ subscales have demonstrated adequate internal consistency (subscale alphas range from 0.65 to 0.77) and evidence suggests validity in non-clinical populations (Green et al, 2008;Gudjonsson et al, 2002). Cronbach's internal consistency coefficients for the PSQ subscales in the present sample were: Interpersonal Suspiciousness/Hostility (12 items) α=0.82, Negative Mood/Withdrawal (7 PERCEPTUAL ANOMALY, SOCIAL ANXIETY, AND PARANOIA 9 items) α=.58, Anger/Impulsiveness (9 items) α=0.70, Mistrust/Wariness (6 items) α=0.74, and Perceived Hardship/Resentment (7 items) α=0.78.…”
Section: Measures Perceptual Anomaly Social Anxiety and Paranoiamentioning
confidence: 99%