Cognition and Intelligence 2004
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511607073.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Human Intelligence with Artificial Intelligence: Adaptive Item Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the learning measures we implement in future studies should be developed entirely from scratch-and then iteratively refined-using a cognitive processing model, such as Embretson's (1998Embretson's ( , 2002Embretson's ( , 2005 Cognitive Design System, or the EvidenceCentered Design model (Behrens et al 2004;Mislevy et al 2003). Using a variety of protocols, such as task analysis, we need to closely examine the cognitive processes taking place as participants interact with the SimLandia environment and curriculum, in order to establish a refined list of constructs for learning and motivation from a cognitive information processing perspective.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the learning measures we implement in future studies should be developed entirely from scratch-and then iteratively refined-using a cognitive processing model, such as Embretson's (1998Embretson's ( , 2002Embretson's ( , 2005 Cognitive Design System, or the EvidenceCentered Design model (Behrens et al 2004;Mislevy et al 2003). Using a variety of protocols, such as task analysis, we need to closely examine the cognitive processes taking place as participants interact with the SimLandia environment and curriculum, in order to establish a refined list of constructs for learning and motivation from a cognitive information processing perspective.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework the construction of an item generator starts with a definition of the latent trait and the cognitive processes that characterize it. This process is referred to as the construction of a cognitive model (Embretson, 1998(Embretson, , 2005Gorin, 2006). The psychometrician then chooses an item format to measure the latent trait.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the cognitive model is condensed into a more specific cognitive item model by outlining the item features that are assumed to trigger the cognitive processes used to solve the test items (e.g. Arendasy & Sommer, in press;Arendasy et al, 2008;Embretson, 1998Embretson, , 2005Gorin, 2006). These item features are commonly referred to as radicals (Irvine, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both methods involve an experimental manipulation of item design features and the mathematical modeling of their effect on either response latencies (cognitive component analysis), or item difficulties, automatic item generation has shown to bypass several limitations of cognitive component analysis by means of more elaborated psychometric models used to analyze the data (cf. Arendasy & Sommer, in press-a;Embretson, 1998Embretson, , 2005Irvine & Kyllonen, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%