2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring honesty-humility with an implicit association test (IAT): Construct and criterion validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergent validity manifests in correlations between measures that assess the same construct using different methods (Rensburg et al, 2022). The average variance extracted (AVE) values with a recommended threshold greater than 0.50 confirm data adequacy (Fornell & Larker, 1981;Hair et al, 2020).…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Convergent validity manifests in correlations between measures that assess the same construct using different methods (Rensburg et al, 2022). The average variance extracted (AVE) values with a recommended threshold greater than 0.50 confirm data adequacy (Fornell & Larker, 1981;Hair et al, 2020).…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Construct validity is operationalized through CFA (Morad et al, 2020). Another way to establish a phenomenon's CFA is to verify its reliability and assess its convergent and discriminant validity with other measures to complete the factor analyses (Rensburg et al, 2022). A measure's reliability is determined by its internal consistency, which determines whether there is evidence that items are correlated enough to determine how well they measure the same construct (Hill et al, 2014).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergent validity is the extent to which each measurement item loads with a significant t-value on its latent construct (Rensburg et al, 2022). According to Fornell & Larcker (1981), convergent validity coefficients should be higher than or equal to 0.50.…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IAT has a poor test-retest reliability (Cunningham et al, 2001;Egloff et al, 2005;LeBel & Paunonen, 2011), and participants have trouble seeing its job relevance and feel like they have little opportunity to perform (Wright & Meade, 2011). Additionally, in one recent study, an IAT of H-H showed no evidence for the criterion-related validity (Van Rensburg et al, 2022).…”
Section: Hypothesis 2 (H2)mentioning
confidence: 90%