2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring hindfoot alignment in weight bearing CT: A novel clinical relevant measurement method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, different radiographic views are necessary for a detailed assessment of the posterior facet, which is a considerable drawback compared to CT scans. Although DRRs reconstructed out of a weight‐bearing CT scan dataset have shown to be more reliable in defining hindfoot malalignment compared to conventional radiographs, it is questionable if this novel imaging modality will replace X‐rays in the days to come . A detailed analysis of specific areas is possible using single CT images, but also the alignment can be assessed using DRRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, different radiographic views are necessary for a detailed assessment of the posterior facet, which is a considerable drawback compared to CT scans. Although DRRs reconstructed out of a weight‐bearing CT scan dataset have shown to be more reliable in defining hindfoot malalignment compared to conventional radiographs, it is questionable if this novel imaging modality will replace X‐rays in the days to come . A detailed analysis of specific areas is possible using single CT images, but also the alignment can be assessed using DRRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, it allows a good clinical screening of hindfoot deformities, which is what we really wanted to do in our study. There is no doubt that radiological methods and CT scan methods published are more precise, but also more complex . In fact, they were designed for the preoperative planning of corrective surgical procedures to correct hindfoot malalignment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that radiological methods and CT scan methods published are more precise, but also more complex. [13][14][15] In fact, they were designed for the preoperative planning of corrective surgical procedures to correct hindfoot malalignment. We assume that ideally, our study should have included some type of radiological measurement, although our intention was to describe a simple screening method to be used in clinical practice.…”
Section: Materials S and Me Thodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major limitations is that the malalignment of patients in their study was assessed clinically and not radiographically . It has been demonstrated in several publications that the clinical assessment of hindfoot alignment is often incorrect and underestimates the underlying deformity (Figure ) . De Cesar Netto et al analysed clinical and radiographic alignment in 29 patients (30 feet) with adult‐acquired flatfoot deformity and demonstrated that clinical evaluation often underestimates the underlying flatfoot deformity by up to 15 degrees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) has increased in use for preoperative and postoperative assessment of patients with hindfoot disorders . This novel imaging modality improves the assessment of joint alignment and degeneration under weightbearing conditions (Figures and ) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%