2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring heterogeneity in perceived satisfaction of private vehicle users towards attributes affecting access to metro stations: A case study of Delhi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, PMS-II (basic information on the availability of a parking lot + either availability of VMS or directional information inside the parking lot) is considered as a higher disutility (-0.7310) by the drive-alone users than PMS-III (basic information on the availability of a parking lot + availability of VMS + directional information inside the parking lot) (-0.5005). It should be mentioned that most of the parking facilities in the study area lack smart PMSs such as VMS, which display real-time information on the number of available spaces at the parking lots ( 5 ). Because of this, the survey respondents seem to be unaware of such smart and improved parking facilities, and appear to be satisfied with the existing scenario in which only basic information on the availability of a parking lot is available, perceiving it to be the best.…”
Section: Model Development Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, PMS-II (basic information on the availability of a parking lot + either availability of VMS or directional information inside the parking lot) is considered as a higher disutility (-0.7310) by the drive-alone users than PMS-III (basic information on the availability of a parking lot + availability of VMS + directional information inside the parking lot) (-0.5005). It should be mentioned that most of the parking facilities in the study area lack smart PMSs such as VMS, which display real-time information on the number of available spaces at the parking lots ( 5 ). Because of this, the survey respondents seem to be unaware of such smart and improved parking facilities, and appear to be satisfied with the existing scenario in which only basic information on the availability of a parking lot is available, perceiving it to be the best.…”
Section: Model Development Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, importance and satisfaction ratings in relation to the attributes were elicited from users who accessed the metro stations using their private vehicles. To collect their ratings, the users were intercepted at the parking lots at the metro stations in Delhi where they park their vehicles before proceeding to ride the metro ( 5 ). Subsequently, the user ratings were analyzed by revised importance–performance analysis (revised IPA) to identify the critical areas for intervention.…”
Section: Survey and Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further investigation on the egress segment of the trip would be useful, particularly given the somewhat different mix of modes used for egress compared with access. Moreover, this research did not control the influence of personal social attributes and preferences [45]. Finally, when considering the response differences between local areas, one needs to admit the possibility of self-selection with regard to mode choice and response to the attributes of those particular local environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The advantage of RIDIT is that, sometimes, the rating data may not be adequately analyzed using statistical methods such as chi-square or t-test, but RIDIT might be beneficial as its analysis is distribution free ( 11 , 12 ). This study calculated the mean RIDIT values for each attribute identified earlier using the steps mentioned ( 13 , 14 ):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%