Measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL) in community and facility-based care settings with the interRAI assessment instruments: development of a crosswalk to HUI3

Abstract

BackgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures are of interest because they can be used to describe health of populations and represent a broader health outcome for population health analyses than mortality rates or life expectancy. The most widely used measure of HRQoL for deriving estimates of health-adjusted life expectancy is the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3). The HUI3 is available in most national surveys administered by Statistics Canada, and has been used as part of a microsimulation model to examine the impact of neurological conditions over the life course. Persons receiving home care and nursing home services are often not well-represented in these surveys; however, interRAI assessment instruments are now used as part of normal clinical practice in these settings for nine Canadian provinces/territories. Building on previous research that developed a HUI2 crosswalk for the interRAI assessments, the present study examined a new interRAI HRQoL index crosswalked to the HUI3.MethodsinterRAI and survey data were used to examine the distributional properties of global and domain-specific interRAI HRQoL and HUI3 index scores, respectively. Three populations were considered: well-elderly persons not receiving home care, home care clients and nursing home residents.ResultsThe mean HUI3 and interRAI HRQoL index global scores declined from independent healthy older persons to home care clients, followed by nursing home residents. For the home care and nursing home populations, the interRAI HRQoL global estimates tended to be lower than HUI3 global scores obtained from survey respondents. While there were some statistically significant age, sex and diagnostic group differences in global scores and within attributes, the most notable differences were between populations from different care settings.DiscussionThe present study provides strong evidence for the validity of the interRAI HRQoL based on comparisons of distributional properties with those obtained with survey data based on the HUI3. The results demonstrate the importance of admission criteria for home care and nursing home settings, where function plays a more important role than demographic or diagnostic criteria. The interRAI HRQoL has a distinct advantage because it is gathered as part of normal clinical practice in care settings where interRAI instruments are mandatory and are used to assess all eligible persons in those sectors. In particular, those with severe cognitive and functional impairments (who tend to be under-represented in survey data) will be evaluated using the interRAI tools. Future research should build on this work by providing direct, person-level comparisons of interRAI HRQoL index and HUI3 scores, as well as longitudinal analyses to examine responsiveness to change.

Cost-effectiveness of a Province-wide Quality Improvement Initiative for Reducing Potentially Inappropriate Use of Antipsychotics in Long-Term Care in British Columbia, Canada

“…The RAI database captures resident-level information on socio-demographic characteristics, clinical conditions including comorbidities, daily living activities, vision, speech, hearing, cognition, pain, and depression [23]. A previous study mapped RAI variables to Health Utility Index (HUI) version 3 attributes and provided weighted utility scores using Canadian tariffs [32]. We used these utility weights for RAI variables and applied the following validated equation to calculate the HRQoL scores:…”

The primary care and other health system use of home care patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

“…Patient characteristics were identified from the baseline assessment and included demographic, health and functional characteristics, frailty, 10 healthrelated quality of life 16 and 3 key conditions known to be primary drivers of home care: congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary dis ease and dementia. [17][18][19] Similar to other studies 20 we also clas sified each patient's primary care enrolment model at base line.…”

“Establishing the criterion validity of the interRAI Check-Up Self-Report instrument”

“…All adult instruments are built on a minimum set common set of common items, as well as specialised items relevant to particular contexts and patient groups, and are designed to track persons longitudinally over time and across multiple care settings. These instruments have been continuously improved and validated against other commonly used instruments for use in long-term care, acute and post-acute care, home care, mental health, palliative and community settings [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The item domains of these instruments have been shown to have good interrater reliability [16] and have been adopted internationally, including countries in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Australasia and East and South East Asia [26,27].…”