2015
DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2015.1033895
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring hard power: China’s economic growth and military capacity

Abstract: China's rapid economic development has facilitated a dramatic increase in its military capacity and international security presence. But there is considerable disagreement over how large its economy and military capacity is. Underlying the debate is the fact that market and PPP exchange rate comparisons give very different pictures of China's relative economic size, and neither is the appropriate price deflator with which to compare relative military capacities. We address this issue by deriving a relative mil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, in recent years, the optimization of military expenditure structure in China concentrates on the mechanization and informatization construction, which has significant spill-over effects in other sectors, including the utilities sector. China is the world's second-largest country in defence spending (Furuoka et al, 2016;Robertson & Sin, 2017). However, the overall asset securitization rate of the military industrial is low compared with developed economies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, in recent years, the optimization of military expenditure structure in China concentrates on the mechanization and informatization construction, which has significant spill-over effects in other sectors, including the utilities sector. China is the world's second-largest country in defence spending (Furuoka et al, 2016;Robertson & Sin, 2017). However, the overall asset securitization rate of the military industrial is low compared with developed economies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Russia, (re)asserting its international strategic role necessitates a strong military pillar vis-à-vis the US or other major strategic players globally. Once again, in the case of the coefficient for China, a twofold explanation can be postulated: either a broad follower mode of behavior adopted by Russia as both rising powers are asserting and establishing their political and military presence and role in international affairs often in a loosely cooperative manner and/or an effort by Russia not to lag behind the massive Chinese military build-up fueled by the rapidly growing Chinese economy (Robertson and Sin, 2017). Finally, as a further step in the analysis and as a test of robustness, the nonparametric effects of the determinants of Russian military expenditure are graphically shown in Figs.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…165 The personnel costs alone of China's border defense forces consume at least 15 percent of the PLA's budget. 166 All told, then, at least 35 percent of China's military budget, as reported by the most popular source for military spending data, goes to homeland security operations: 20 percent for the People's Armed Police and an additional 15 percent for border defense troops. These costs act as a persistent "domestic drag" on China's military modernization, putting robust power projection forces further out of reach for the PLA.…”
Section: Homeland Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%