2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring growth rate in high-throughput growth phenotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first problem is the neighbor effect. To date arrayed-colonies have been used for high-throughput growth quantification because experiment throughput is dramatically increased by manipulating high-density arrayed colonies (1536 colonies/plate) using robotic technology [6]. Since this method can provide cost-effective growth measurement, high-density arrays have been widely used in phenotype screening studies of genome-wide mutant library [1-5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first problem is the neighbor effect. To date arrayed-colonies have been used for high-throughput growth quantification because experiment throughput is dramatically increased by manipulating high-density arrayed colonies (1536 colonies/plate) using robotic technology [6]. Since this method can provide cost-effective growth measurement, high-density arrays have been widely used in phenotype screening studies of genome-wide mutant library [1-5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies should seek to address how common such pleiotropic effects are and whether their qualitative and quantitative effects on fitness can contribute to the maintenance of low wild-type mutation rates in natural populations. High-throughput growth rate screens (Blomberg, 2011;Hall et al, 2014) of mutant libraries could be conducted as a first approximation of fitness effects of mutation rate modifiers in model organisms such as yeast and E. coli; such growth rate measurements, however, may not capture all aspects of competitive fitness and may differ significantly in different propagation conditions (for example, MutS may be directly beneficial to bacteria in oxidizing environments: Torres-Barceló et al, 2013). Any comprehensive investigation of potential direct mutator fitness effects in asexual populations, moreover, will be complicated by the difficulty of separating direct fitness effects from indirect selective effects due to associated mutations.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial growth is measured by optical density (in liquid medium) or colony size (on solid medium). Hundreds of microtiter plates, robotic equipment, and specific standardization methods are required to minimize the systematic variation and batch effects across plates (22). Using an Illumina next-generationsequencing platform (23), a method to profile a library of loss-of-function Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in response to small molecules was developed (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%