1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00542-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring forest damage of ungulates: what should be considered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This consisted of noting the presence of any tracks or burning within the plot and any evidence of tree cutting and browsing impacts. Browsing impacts were assessed based on a list of indicators provided by Reimoser et al (1999) and Rooney and Waller (2003) and included (i) the presence of browsing on seedlings, saplings and tree twigs, (ii) the presence of a browse line (i.e. horizontal line below which there is no growth on mature trees) and (iii) the presence of browsing animals.…”
Section: Research Was Conducted Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consisted of noting the presence of any tracks or burning within the plot and any evidence of tree cutting and browsing impacts. Browsing impacts were assessed based on a list of indicators provided by Reimoser et al (1999) and Rooney and Waller (2003) and included (i) the presence of browsing on seedlings, saplings and tree twigs, (ii) the presence of a browse line (i.e. horizontal line below which there is no growth on mature trees) and (iii) the presence of browsing animals.…”
Section: Research Was Conducted Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obs.). According to Reimoser et al (1999) [41] the absence of ground vegetation, the existence of a browse line and of palatable species confined to sites inaccessible to deer observed in these places, all indicate a very heavy browsing pressure.…”
Section: Haida Gwaii and Deermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the three sites we selected the absence of ground vegetation, the existence of a browsing limit and the confinement of palatable species to inaccessible areas indicate a very heavy browsing pressure (Reimoser et al, 1999). Site 1 was situated on Reef Island (249 ha).…”
Section: Queen Charlotte Islands and Sampling Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%