2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring fluctuations in paranoia: Validity and psychometric properties of brief state versions of the Paranoia Checklist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State paranoia -Paranoia Checklist (5-item state version, PC-5; Schlier et al, 2016) This brief version of the PC was developed to keep participant burden low. Items are rated on a 5-point scale (1, not at all; 5, very strongly), with higher scores indicating greater levels of state paranoia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State paranoia -Paranoia Checklist (5-item state version, PC-5; Schlier et al, 2016) This brief version of the PC was developed to keep participant burden low. Items are rated on a 5-point scale (1, not at all; 5, very strongly), with higher scores indicating greater levels of state paranoia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PaDS also assesses the perceived deservedness of persecution and the PDI assesses delusion-like qualities of persecutory ideas (conviction, pre-occupation, and distress). The PC (Freeman et al, 2005), SPC (Schlier, Moritz, & Lincoln, 2016), and the GPTS (Green et al, 2008), assess paranoia across the hierarchy, including ideas of reference and persecutory ideation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freeman et al, 2015) have only assessed persecutory thoughts, therefore not capturing potentially more commonly-occurring thoughts from the lower paranoia hierarchy (Freeman et al, 2005). The SPC (Schlier et al, 2016) is a state measure assessing a broader range of paranoid experiences, but requires further psychometric validation (e.g. reliability, structural validity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r State-paranoia was measured using the 3-item change sensitive version of the PC, which has been found to be a valid and change-sensitive scale for clinically paranoid populations (α = .74; Schlier et al, 2016). Items were: 'I have to be on my guard against others', 'Strangers and friends look at me critically' and 'People are trying to make me upset'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%