2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.99.062309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring fermionic entanglement: Entropy, negativity, and spin structure

Abstract: The recent direct experimental measurement of quantum entanglement paves the way towards a better understanding of many-body quantum systems and their correlations. Nevertheless, the experimental and theoretical advances had so far been predominantly limited to bosonic systems. Here, we study fermionic systems. Using experimental setups where multiple copies of the same state are prepared, arbitrary order Rényi entanglement entropies and entanglement negativities can be extracted by utilizing spatially-uniform… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also showed that the transition classification and the existence of V min depend on whether the system is led to ordinary or full localization, and to the best of our knowledge such distinction has not been considered before. Additionally, as the experimental detection and characterization of entanglement via several protocols have been a current achievement 34,6367 , our results could contribute to the detection of quantum phase transitions in experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We have also showed that the transition classification and the existence of V min depend on whether the system is led to ordinary or full localization, and to the best of our knowledge such distinction has not been considered before. Additionally, as the experimental detection and characterization of entanglement via several protocols have been a current achievement 34,6367 , our results could contribute to the detection of quantum phase transitions in experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Note that some works normalize each block by each trace [21,22,23] before calculating the entropies, which thus quantify the entanglement after a projective charge measurement. We prefer not to do so and instead use (6), following [19,20], because the resulting entropies are not only more accessible to calculations, but are also directly experimentally measurable, using either the replica trick [20,24,25], or random time evolution which conserves the charge [26,27]. Let us also note that S 1 (Q A ) is simply the distribution P (Q A ) of charge in subsystem A. WhenQ can assume any integer value (e.g., when particle number or total S z are conserved), we define the flux-resolved REE as S n (α) = Tr ρ n A e iαQ A .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b), which are readily available in NISQ devices and have been already successfully applied to measure entanglement entropies, many-body state fidelities, and out-of-time ordered correlators [10,[33][34][35]. In contrast to previous proposals for measuring PT moments, our protocol does not rely on many-body interference between identical state copies [6,29,36], or on using global entangling random unitaries [37] built from interacting Hamiltonians [16,[38][39][40]. Instead, it only requires singlequbit control, and allows for the estimation of many distinct PT moments from the same data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%