2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring exhaled nitric oxide at high altitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison with the results of Hemmingson et al (18) than that in NH during an acute exposure to very high altitude (10 min at 5000 m), the present data additionally show that the exNO can decrease in HH up to 24 h of exposure at an altitude of 3000 m. As proposed, the increased axial back diffusion of NO in the alveolar compartment when BP is decreased (37) coupled with the strong affinity of NO to hemoglobin (23) or pressure-induced suppression of the NO formation in the airways (20) may explain the lower exNO observed in HH. However, exNO should be interpreted with care because values were corrected for flow deviation and sensor sensitivity with correction factors of Hemmingsson et al (17), which may vary due to different subject and/or sensor. Nevertheless, our results are in accordance with previously published results (18) but suggest other mechanisms for differences in ventilatoiy responses between HH and NH based on the interplay between exaggerated oxidative stress and impaired NO bioavailability in blood and tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By comparison with the results of Hemmingson et al (18) than that in NH during an acute exposure to very high altitude (10 min at 5000 m), the present data additionally show that the exNO can decrease in HH up to 24 h of exposure at an altitude of 3000 m. As proposed, the increased axial back diffusion of NO in the alveolar compartment when BP is decreased (37) coupled with the strong affinity of NO to hemoglobin (23) or pressure-induced suppression of the NO formation in the airways (20) may explain the lower exNO observed in HH. However, exNO should be interpreted with care because values were corrected for flow deviation and sensor sensitivity with correction factors of Hemmingsson et al (17), which may vary due to different subject and/or sensor. Nevertheless, our results are in accordance with previously published results (18) but suggest other mechanisms for differences in ventilatoiy responses between HH and NH based on the interplay between exaggerated oxidative stress and impaired NO bioavailability in blood and tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental design consisted of two different 24-h periods of exposure to HH and NH, in a random order with two groups of three subjects and one group of four subjects. For each subject, experiments were separated by 23 d in average (range, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], allowing sufficient elimination of any acclimatization effect.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The technical specifications of the instrument list an operating range of barometric pressures from 700 to 1060 hPa or from about 3100m to below sea level. Yet a 2009 paper identified factors that cause the readings to be inaccurate at high altitudes and warned against using the device above 1000m [29]. That paper suggested using two correction factors based on measurement of nine people in a temperature-controlled hypobaric chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%