2001
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
391
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(396 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
391
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This approach to fitting psychometric curves is more general as it helps to estimate left/right choice biases (64). The psychometric function had the following form:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). This approach to fitting psychometric curves is more general as it helps to estimate left/right choice biases (64). The psychometric function had the following form:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the slope of intelligibility functions for the Dutch material might be biased 6 since in this case the intelligibility function was derived from adaptive data (Kaernbach, 2001). And finally, during the measurement using the Dutch test, subjects had no possibility of correcting their mistakes if they accidentally pressed an inappropriate key, and consequently the upper asymptote of the intelligibility function did not reach 100 %, which might have decreased the intelligibility function slope (Klein, 2001). Further factors affecting the inconsistency between parameters of the intelligibility functions across languages might result from differences in their linguistic structure and differences across speakers.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intelligibility Function For Digit Triplets Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the so-called 'lapse rate' (i.e. the probability of mistakes made for intelligible speech signals) is reduced and, consequently, bias in intelligibility data is minimized (Klein, 2001). The subject's response was scored 1 if the entire triplet was repeated correctly, otherwise the response was scored 0 (this method is called triplet scoring 4 , which produces steep intelligibility functions, resulting in more accurate measurement).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To substantiate these descriptive findings, the best-fitting psychometric function was calculated using a Weibull cumulative function (Klein, 2001). This analysis allows for estimation of the horizontal (frequency) shift of the psychometric function.…”
Section: Identification Performancementioning
confidence: 99%