The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/1743727x.2014.914486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring equity in educational effectiveness research: the properties and possibilities of quantitative indicators

Abstract: There has never been a published discursive review of equity measurement methodology in educational effectiveness research, though the literature on equity is growing. This paper sets out several indices that have the potential to measure it in terms of pupil attainment or in terms of how far a school (or group of schools) is from having a 'fair' proportion of its success attributable to a 'fair' proportion of its student population. The paper explores the principles and properties of three relatively simple m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the fact that the Theils T is associated with a higher marginal utility of equity for transfers from the 'have-lots' to the 'have-nots' could be of paramount importance to policy making in resource-constrained countries, where the 'havenots' form the majority. Nonetheless, this is also a weakness, as it fails to demonstrate the transferability property (Kelly, 2015). Moreover, its range is from zero to positive infinity, making interpretation and comparability complex.…”
Section: Conclusion and Reflections On The Best Way To Conceptualisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the fact that the Theils T is associated with a higher marginal utility of equity for transfers from the 'have-lots' to the 'have-nots' could be of paramount importance to policy making in resource-constrained countries, where the 'havenots' form the majority. Nonetheless, this is also a weakness, as it fails to demonstrate the transferability property (Kelly, 2015). Moreover, its range is from zero to positive infinity, making interpretation and comparability complex.…”
Section: Conclusion and Reflections On The Best Way To Conceptualisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of metrics have been suggested by which to measure inequity in education. (2007), Kelly (2012), Kelly (2015), Agrawal (2014), Gorard and Smith (2004), Haughton and Khandker (2014), and Kyriakides and Creemers (2011) provide a variety of metrics for educational inequity. These include the range, the range ratio, the coefficient of variation, the variance, the standard deviation, the correlation coefficient, the McLoone index, the Gini coefficient, the Theil index, the regression slope, the Lorenz curve and the attainment equity, among others.…”
Section: Measures Of (In)equity In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations