Measuring emergency department crowding in an inner city hospital in The Netherlands

Abstract

BackgroundOvercrowding in the emergency department (ED) is an increasing problem worldwide. In The Netherlands overcrowding is not a major issue, although some urban hospitals struggle with increased throughput. In 2004, Weiss et al. created the NEDOCS tool (National Emergency Department Over Crowding Study), a web-based instrument to measure objective overcrowding with scores between 0 (not busy at all) to above 181 (disaster). In this study we tried to validate the accuracy of the NEDOCS tool by comparing this with the subjective feelings of the ED nurse and emergency physician (EP) in an inner city hospital in The Netherlands.MethodsIn a 4-week period, data of a total of 147 time samplings were collected. The subjective feelings of being overcrowded and feeling rushed by the ED nurse and EP were scored on a survey using a 6-point Likert scale on answering the question of how busy they would say the ED is right now. NEDOCS tool scores were calculated, and these were compared with the subjective feelings using the kappa statistic assessing linear weights according to Cohen’s method.ResultsOf all the time samplings, approximately 80% of the surveys were completed. The ED was rated as overcrowded 9% of the time by the ED nurses and 11% of the time by the EPs. The median NEDOCS score was 37 (0 to 120) and scored as overcrowded in 3%. There was a good intrarater agreement for the ED nurse and EP for the feeling of overcrowding and feeling of being rushed (κ = 0.79 and 0.73, respectively); the interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.53 and 0.43, respectively). The agreement between the NEDOCS and the subjective variables was moderate (κ = 0.50 and 0.53, respectively). A composite variable was created as the average of both the scores of feeling overcrowded of the nurse and the EP and the score of the EP of feeling rushed. The agreement between this and the NEDOCS was κ = 0.53.ConclusionsThe NEDOCS tool is a reasonably good tool to quantify the subjective feelings of overcrowding. When overcrowding is encountered and immediately recognised, specific measures can be taken to guarantee the timely provision of necessary medical care to the patients in the ED at that time. However, possibly more accurate agreements could be obtained as approximately 20% of the surveys were not completed because of perceived crowdedness. An important limitation is that only 3% of the NEDOCS is scored as overcrowded, so no conclusions can be drawn about the agreement for higher categories of overcrowding. It is suggested to repeat the study in a busier period. As the triage category was not taken into account in the formula, a high workload with only a few patients giving high scores in subjective overcrowding in spite of a low NEDOCS score could have led to lower agreements. Incorporating the triage category in the NEDOCS tool possibly will lead to better agreement, but further research is needed to assess this idea.

Implementing evidence‐based practices in an emergency department: contradictions exposed when prioritising a flow culture

“…Combined with a reduction in bed capacity, this development has led to overcrowding in many emergency departments (Anneveld et al . , O'Connor et al . ).…”

Triage at the Emergency Department: association between triage levels and patient outcome

“…In developing countries, including Brazil, this problem becomes even more serious because emergency services represent the main access route to the health care system (1)(2)(3) . Previous studies have shown that overcrowding leads to increased health costs, decreased efficiency and quality of care, and increased incidence of adverse events and mortality, all of which culminate in poor performance of the health care system (4)(5)(6)(7) .…”

Evaluation of Overcrowding of Emergency Department in Imam Reza Hospital in 2015 by Implementing 2 Scales: NEDOCS and EDWIN

“…Anneveled et al showed that NEDOCS scale could accurately predict overcrowdings in ED (16). McCarthy et al evaluated both scales' accuracy to be average and resulted that ED occupancy rate was not ideal, but its simplicity makes it feasible every time anywhere (17).…”