2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring early childhood development at a global scale: Evidence from the Caregiver-Reported Early Development Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
84
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-validation approach evaluated the robustness of the model with a R 2 of 57%. Personal monitoring of exposure to HAP by wearing portable devices for a period of 24 to 48 hours can substantially reduce exposure misclassification and improve the power of the study to detect relationships between exposure to HAP and adverse health outcomes (40). However, conducting area or personal air quality monitoring in all study subjects significantly increases study costs and respondent burden.…”
Section: Exposure Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-validation approach evaluated the robustness of the model with a R 2 of 57%. Personal monitoring of exposure to HAP by wearing portable devices for a period of 24 to 48 hours can substantially reduce exposure misclassification and improve the power of the study to detect relationships between exposure to HAP and adverse health outcomes (40). However, conducting area or personal air quality monitoring in all study subjects significantly increases study costs and respondent burden.…”
Section: Exposure Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third limitation is that the CREDI is—by construction—a caregiver-reported tool, and may introduce bias into children’s developmental scores because caregivers may not be aware of specific milestone completion or may misreport it. Previous validity studies suggest that all CREDI items are well understood by caregivers, and that CREDI scores are highly predictive of direct observation measures of the same children 26. Despite these tests, reporting biases are of course possible, particularly for items that leave room for subjective interpretation such as making babbling sounds or saying the first word.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CREDI was created in 2017 with the ambition to generate a low-cost, cross-culturally comparable measure of the motor, cognitive, language and socioemotional skills of children under 3 years. The CREDI have been tested and validated in 16 low-income, middle-income and high-income countries and has been shown to have high acceptability, reliability and validity across diverse cultural and socioeconomic settings 23 26…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the limitations of clinical screening assessments, several tools have emerged to assess early childhood development at the population level. The Caregiver-Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI) is developed for children under three years old and evaluates their early development (13). As it was designed to function across a wide variety of culture, linguistic, and socioeconomic contexts, it has been promoted in 16 countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%