1999
DOI: 10.1080/096382899297729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring disability with parsimony

Abstract: Routine inclusion of a global disability item in surveys is recommended, and specific suggestions are made to aid its design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 From 1993 through 2001, more than 1.2 million adults 18 years of age or older in the U.S. answered these questions on the population-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance (BRFSS) surveys. Measures based on these questions have proved useful in quantifying the perceived burden of chronic health conditions [19][20][21][22][23][24] and disabilities 25,26 and have helped to identify the health-related needs of vulnerable populations. [27][28][29][30] For the present study, we used these data to estimate trends in HRQOL and SRH for adults in the U.S. and for sociodemographic and geographic groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 From 1993 through 2001, more than 1.2 million adults 18 years of age or older in the U.S. answered these questions on the population-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance (BRFSS) surveys. Measures based on these questions have proved useful in quantifying the perceived burden of chronic health conditions [19][20][21][22][23][24] and disabilities 25,26 and have helped to identify the health-related needs of vulnerable populations. [27][28][29][30] For the present study, we used these data to estimate trends in HRQOL and SRH for adults in the U.S. and for sociodemographic and geographic groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,19,22 In se ve ral studi es, the pre va len ce of ac ti vity li mi ta ti ons in chil dren with chro nic he alth con di ti on was re ported to ran ge from 3.6 to 14.8%. 7,9,15,23,[26][27][28] Alt ho ugh the scho ol ab sen ce days in chil dren with chro nic he alth con di ti ons (Tab le 4) we re slightly hig her than that re por ted el sew he re 9,23 it was still wit hin the re fe ren ce po ints. 11,25,26,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 If ans wer was yes; fa mi li es we re then as ked what he alth prob lem the ir chil dren suf fe red in or der to de ter mi ne ac ti vity limi ta ti on. Ba sed on res pon ses, ac ti vity-li mi ta ti ons we re gro u ped as mo bi lity, self-ca re, com mu ni ca tion with the con tent pa ral lel to the sub do ma ins inc lu ded wit hin the ICF hand bo ok 16 and as in many si mi lar stu di es.…”
Section: Ma Te Ri Al and Met Hodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Responses were collapsed to a dichotomous outcome, poor health (very bad health, bad health) versus good health (moderate health, good health, very good health). Single items have been frequently used to measure SRH (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40). Test-retest reliability for single items range from 0.7 to 0.8.…”
Section: Main Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%