Measuring diet cost at the individual level: a comparison of three methods

Abstract

Background/objectives:Household-level food spending data are not suitable for population-based studies of the economics of nutrition. This study compared three methods of deriving diet cost at the individual level.Subjects/methods:Adult men and women (n=164) completed 4-day diet diaries and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Food expenditures over 4 weeks and supermarket prices for 384 foods were obtained. Diet costs (US$/day) were estimated using: (1) diet diaries and expenditures; (2) diet diaries and supermarket prices; and (3) FFQs and supermarket prices. Agreement between the three methods was assessed on the basis of Pearson correlations and limits of agreement. Income-related differences in diet costs were estimated using general linear models.Results:Diet diaries yielded mean (s.d.) diet costs of $10.04 (4.27) based on Method 1 and $8.28 (2.32) based on Method 2. FFQs yielded mean diet costs of $7.66 (2.72) based on Method 3. Correlations between energy intakes and costs were highest for Method 3 (r2=0.66), lower for Method 2 (r2=0.24) and lowest for Method 1 (r2=0.06). Cost estimates were significantly associated with household incomes.Conclusion:The weak association between food expenditures and food intake using Method 1 makes it least suitable for diet and health research. However, merging supermarket food prices with standard dietary assessment tools can provide estimates of individual diet cost that are more closely associated with food consumed. The derivation of individual diet cost can provide insights into some of the economic determinants of food choice, diet quality and health.

The food retail revolution in China and its association with diet and health

“…In a series of studies A. Drewnowski and others have shown that processed foods are less expensive per calorie, which might explain the high intake of processed foods and the poor diets of low-income Americans (Drewnowski and Rehm, 2013a, b; Monsivais et al, 2013). …”

The Challenge in Improving the Diets of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients: A Historical Commentary

“…This paper is not meant to impugn the motives or behaviors of low-income Americans, as the foods they consume are dependent on forces that have made unhealthy foods the least expensive per kilocalorie 52–56 and have also led administrators to base SNAP on inadequate thrifty food plan costs. 415758 Subsequent papers in this Special Issue lay out the pros and cons of creating SNAP food or beverage restrictions to improve the diets of SNAP recipients.…”

Assessing the Utility of Retailer Based on Generalized Costs of End-Consumers

“…Assessing the utility of retailer presented via the O-D matrix of generalized cost of end-consumers (17). The generalized costs are calculated on models (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and the results of calculations are given in Table 5. Assessing the utility of retailer presented via the O-D matrix of generalized cost of end-consumers (1).…”

“…Determining the cost estimate of the energy costs of the human body in the purchasing process is based on the analysis of the required amount of calories for human existence (Postanova, 2000). According to the normative documents, the daily consumption of calories for normal functioning is 2790.8 kcal (Monsivais, et al, 2013). But this value may depend on gender, age, and the physical activity of a person.…”