Measuring Dexterity in Children Using the Nine-hole Peg Test

Poole, Janet L.; Burtner, Patricia A.; Torres, Theresa; McMullen, Cheryl Kirk; Markham, Amy; Marcum, Michelle; Anderson, Jennifer; Qualls, Clifford

doi:10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.003

Cited by 147 publications

(127 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

103

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Disease duration in patients ranged between 2 and 57 months (median, 21 Unusually high completion times (z score Ͼ 2) were only observed for the Nine-Hole Peg Test (dominant hand mean, 19.5 Ϯ2.6 seconds; nondominant hand mean, 19.7 Ϯ 1.3 seconds) compared with normative data. 17 Mean lesion load for all patients was low in supratentorial …”

Section: Demographic Data Disease and Mr Imaging Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Early White Matter Changes in Childhood Multiple Sclerosis: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

Blaschek¹,

Keeser²,

Müller³

et al. 2013

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Demographic Data Disease and Mr Imaging Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All values were compared with normative data. 17,18 All clinical scores were converted to z scores. The z score indicates the deviation from the mean population score.…”

Section: Clinical Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early White Matter Changes in Childhood Multiple Sclerosis: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

Blaschek¹,

Keeser²,

Müller³

et al. 2013

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Consensus was reached not to use the “nine hole peg test,”18 as 78% scored this as 1/2/3 (opposite consensus).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome assessment for Brachial Plexus birth injury. Results from the iPluto world‐wide consensus survey

Pondaag

Malessy

2018

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no consensus regarding strategies to optimally treat children with a brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Comparison of outcome data presented by different centers is impossible due to the use of (1) many different outcome measures to evaluate results; (2) different follow‐up periods after interventions; and (3) different patient ages at the time of assessment. The goal of iPluto (international PLexus oUtcome sTudy grOup) was to define a standardized dataset which should be minimally collected to evaluate upper limb function in children with BPBI. This dataset must enable comparison of the treatment results of different centers if prospectively used. Three rounds of internet surveys were used to reach consensus on the dataset. A Delphi‐derived technique was applied using a nine point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as having attained a rating of 7/8/9 by > = 75% of the participants. A total of 59 participants from five continents participated in the Second and Third Rounds of the survey. Consensus was reached regarding four elements: (1) evaluation should take place at the age of 1/3/5/7 years; range of motion in degrees should be measured for (2) passive joint movement; (3) active range of motion; and (4) the Mallet score should be determined. Consensus on how to asses and report outcome for BPBI was only reached on motor items from the “Body Function and Structure” domain. Consensus regarding additional ICF domains to obtain a more elaborate set of outcome items, should be addressed in future research. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 36:2533–2541, 2018.

show abstract

“…Por isso, o desempenho em testes com tarefas desta natureza (i.e., uso de pinos) tem sido frequentemente utilizado na avaliação da função manual de crianças 18,24 , adultos jovens 16,17 e idosos 25 . Num estudo anterior, foi observado que indivíduos diabéticos tiveram um desempenho pior em um teste de pinos (i.e., teste dos pinos de Perdue) 10 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Durante o teste, os participantes foram instruídos a pegarem com os dedos nove pinos de 6,4 mm de diâmetro e 32 mm de comprimento, depositados em um compartimento côncavo, um de cada vez, e encaixá-los em nove buracos (7,1 mm de diâmetro e 13 mm de profundidade) e, imediatamente após a colocação do último pino, retirá-los um a um e recolocá-los no compartimento de origem 6,[16][17][18] . [19][20][21] .…”

Section: Procedimentos Experimentaisunclassified

Avaliação da função manual e da força de preensão palmar máxima em indivíduos com diabetes mellitus

Lima

Freitas

2012

Fisioter. Pesqui.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO | O sucesso na realização de atividades manipulativas é crucial para um estilo independente. Como os diabéticos podem apresentar alterações sensoriais nas mãos, podem demonstrar alterações funcionais em tarefas manipulativas. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o desempenho de indivíduos diabéticos não neuropatas com o de não diabéticos em tarefas manipulativas e na capacidade de geração de força de preensão palmar máxima. Treze diabéticos sem diagnóstico de neuropatia (48, 6±11,51 anos; 79,9±10,88 kg; 1, 68 ±0, 09 m) e 13 controles pareados por sexo e idade (48,5±10, 09 anos; 76, 44±11, 79 kg; 1, 69±0, 1 m) participaram do estudo. A sensibilidade das mãos foi avaliada por meio do kit de monofilamentos Semmes-Weinstein e, em seguida, foram aplicados três testes comumente utilizados para avaliação da função manual na seguinte ordem: teste de função manual Jebsen Taylor (TFMJT), teste dos nove pinos nos buracos (9-PnB) e teste de força de preensão palmar máxi-ma (FPmax). Os resultados do teste de sensibilidade cutânea indicaram que oito diabéticos apresentaram sensibilidade cutânea normal e cinco, alguma alteração sensorial detectá-vel pelo monofilamento, a qual, no entanto, não os caracterizavam como neuropatas. Com relação aos testes funcionais, os resultados não indicaram qualquer diferença entre os grupos para os desempenhos nos três testes realizados (diabéticos e controles -TFMJT: 26, 15±3, 06 e 25, 78±1,29 s; 9-PnB: 15,33±1,35 e 15, 48±2,39 s; FPmax: 41, 15±10,59 e 43, 69±12,59 kgf). Assim, podemos concluir que indivíduos diabéticos sem neuropatia diabética periférica não apresentam qualquer alteração funcional nos membros superiores e na capacidade de gerar força de preensão palmar máxima.Descritores | mão; avaliação; destreza motora; diabetes mellitus.ABSTRACT | A successful object manipulation is crucial for living an independent life. As diabetic individuals could present sensory deficits in their hands, they could decrease functional performance in tasks involving object manipulation. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of diabetic individual without diagnosis of neuropathy with non-diabetic healthy individuals in manipulation task and their maximum power grip strength. Thirteen diabetic individuals without peripheral neuropathy diagnosis (48.6±11.51 years-old; 79.9±10.88 kg; 1.68±0.09 m) and 13 healthy age-and gender-matched controls (48.5±10.09 years-old; 76.44±11.79 kg; 1.69±0.1 m) participated in the study. Hand cutaneous sensitivity was assessed by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments examination (SWME) followed by the application of three tests commonly used to assess hand function: JebsenTaylor hand function test (JTHFT), nine hole peg test (9HPT) and maximum power grip strength test (GSmax). The results of SWME revealed that eight diabetic individuals presented normal cutaneous sensitivity and five showed mild sensory losses, but that was not enough to characterize them as neuropathic diabetics. Regarding the hand function tests, the results revealed no difference b...

show abstract

Measuring Dexterity in Children Using the Nine-hole Peg Test

Cited by 147 publications

References 11 publications

Early White Matter Changes in Childhood Multiple Sclerosis: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

Early White Matter Changes in Childhood Multiple Sclerosis: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

Outcome assessment for Brachial Plexus birth injury. Results from the iPluto world‐wide consensus survey

Avaliação da função manual e da força de preensão palmar máxima em indivíduos com diabetes mellitus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About