2010
DOI: 10.1080/19368621003591319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Destination Competitiveness: An Application of the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index (2007)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, and according to Mazanec and Ring (2011), there are open discussions on several factors, such as methodological issues, the composition of the indices, the use of variables, the comparability of countries on different development stages, the arbitrary weight of variables, the indices reliability and validity and its usefulness. According to Kayar and Kozak (2010), research to date failed to examine competitive factors from the perspective of how effective they are in determining the competitive position of a destination, or, in other words quantitative studies that aim to rank different competitiveness factors. Kozak and Rimmington (1999) consider that destination competitiveness can be evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively.…”
Section: Model Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, and according to Mazanec and Ring (2011), there are open discussions on several factors, such as methodological issues, the composition of the indices, the use of variables, the comparability of countries on different development stages, the arbitrary weight of variables, the indices reliability and validity and its usefulness. According to Kayar and Kozak (2010), research to date failed to examine competitive factors from the perspective of how effective they are in determining the competitive position of a destination, or, in other words quantitative studies that aim to rank different competitiveness factors. Kozak and Rimmington (1999) consider that destination competitiveness can be evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively.…”
Section: Model Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the economic impact of tourism, the tourism industry came to be regarded as a powerful economic source for many countries and regions all over the world (Kayar & Kozak, 2010), a specialization matrix in which the territories need to constantly brace and attract new demand flows but, simultaneously, must deal with carrying capacity issues even more stressed in stagnated life cycle destinations. Acting in a globalized and dynamic market, it becomes evident that the success of tourism destinations is influenced by their relative competitiveness (Enright and Newton, 2004).…”
Section: Tourism Destination Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He claims that although an attribute may be considered to be important, it will not be a determinant of TDC if there is little difference among destinations on the factors. Kayar and Kozak [17] made a study aimed on detecting the more and less effective determinants taking the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index 2007. Their finding reveals that the most effective factors of TDC were air transport infrastructure, natural and cultural resources, ground transport infrastructure, and health and hygiene, respectively.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure Composite Reliability the following formula of Henseler et al [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] A sound measure of internal consistency is a value greater than 0.6and hence all latent constructs of TDC satisfy the composite reliability measure (Table 8).…”
Section: Composite Reliability or Internal Consistency Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%