Measuring Depressive Symptoms in Heart Failure: Validity and Reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire-8

Pressler, Susan J.; Subramanian, Usha; Perkins, Susan M.; Gradus‐Pizlo, Irmina; Kareken, David A.; Kim, Jin Shil; Ding, Yan; Sauvé, Mary Jane; Sloan, Richard G.

doi:10.4037/ajcc2010931

Cited by 103 publications

(80 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The PHQ-8 does not include queries as to suicidality and has similar validity for major depression as the PHQ-9 (Kroenke and Spitzer 2002). The PHQ-8 internal consistency reliability coefficient from previous studies is 0.82 (Pressler et al 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 84%

A comparison of depression prevalence estimates measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire with two administration modes: computer-assisted telephone interviewing versus computer-assisted personal interviewing

Ford

Zhao

et al. 2011

Int J Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 84%

A comparison of depression prevalence estimates measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire with two administration modes: computer-assisted telephone interviewing versus computer-assisted personal interviewing

Ford

Zhao

et al. 2011

Int J Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each of its nine symptoms is ranked on a scale of 0–10: 0 (absent symptom) and 10 (worst possible severity) with a global score range of 0–90. Secondary follow-up measures included: the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ),22 the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)23 and a quality of life visual analogue scale. The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire quantifying functional limitations, symptoms, social limitations and quality of life in the preceding 2 weeks and is sensitive to patients with CHF health status changes 22.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure

Kane

Daveson

Ryan

et al. 2017

BMJ Support Palliat Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have symptoms and concerns which are inadequately addressed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can potentially improve the identification and management of advanced symptoms and palliative concerns. However, these have not been used in CHF.ObjectivesTo examine the feasibility and acceptability of using a PROM—the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)—together with heart failure nurse education and training to improve the identification and management of symptoms and concerns among patients with CHF.MethodsA parallel, mixed methods design with an embedded qualitative component was used to examine the feasibility of recruitment, retention, intervention adherence/compliance and follow-up assessment completion (symptom burden, quality of life, psychological well-being). Patient and nurse qualitative semistructured interviews explored intervention and study design feasibility and its acceptability.ResultsConversion to consent was 46.9% (372 screened, 81 approached, 38 recruited). 66% of patient participants completed the IPOS; 6% of IPOS questionnaire items were missing (non-response). Over two-thirds (65.6%) of these missing items related to three patients. No item was consistently missing; appetite was the most frequent missing item (1.4%). 92% of participants who completed the IPOS completed all follow-up assessments (1–2 days, 1–2 weeks and 4–6 weeks post-IPOS completion) with no missing data. The a priori feasibility objectives were met. Patients and nurses reported the intervention and study design feasible and acceptable.ConclusionsA palliative-specific PROM-based intervention is feasible and acceptable to both patients with CHF and nurses in nurse-led disease management clinics for the purposes of both clinical care and research.

show abstract

“…In the first scale (Part A), the answers ranged, in a fivepoint Likert scale, from (1) totally disagree up to (5) totally agree. In Part B, which measured the evaluation that the subject made on each consequence of the valvular disease, mentioned in the first scale, the responses ranged from (1) very poor up to (5) very good.…”

Section: Instrument For Measuring the Impact Of Disease In The Daily mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Part B, which measured the evaluation that the subject made on each consequence of the valvular disease, mentioned in the first scale, the responses ranged from (1) very poor up to (5) very good.…”

Section: Instrument For Measuring the Impact Of Disease In The Daily mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of the disease: acceptability, ceiling and floor effects and reliability of an instrument on heart failure

Rodrigues

São‐João

et al. 2013

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the acceptability, ceiling/floor effects, and the reliability of the instrument for measuring the Impact of the Disease on the Daily Life of Patients with Valvular Disease (IDCV) when applied to 135 patients with heart failure (HF). Acceptability was evaluated by the percentage of unanswered items and by the proportion of patients who responded to all items; the ceiling/floor effects by the percentage of patients who scored in the top of 10% best and worst results of the scale, respectively. Reliability was estimated by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and stability of the measure (intraclass correlation coefficient -ICC). All patients responded to all items. Ceiling/floor effects evidenced were of moderate magnitude. The Cronbach's alpha was satisfactory for the majority of the domains and ICC> 0.90 in all the domains. The IDCV proved to be an easy to understand questionnaire, with evidence of reliability in patients with HF. DESCRIPTORS RESUMENEste estudio evaluó la aceptabilidad, los efectos pico/tierra y la confiabilidad del instrumento para medir el impacto de la enfermedad en la vida diaria de pacientes con valvulopatía -(IDCV) aplicado a 135 pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. La aceptabilidad fue evaluada por el porcentaje de ítems no respondidos y por la proporción de pacientes que respondieron a todas los ítems; los efectos pico/tierra se calcularon como el porcentaje de pacientes que marcaron en los 10% mejores y en los peores resultados de la escala, respectivamente. La confiabilidad fue estimada por medio de la consistencia interna (coeficiente alfa de Cronbach) y de la estabilidad de la medida (coeficiente de correlación intra-clase -CCI). Todos los pacientes respondieron a todos los ítems. Se evidenció efectos pico/tierra de moderada magnitud. Se constató alfa de Cronbach satisfactorio para la mayoría de los dominios y CCI> 0,90 en todos los dominios. El IDCV demostró ser un cuestionario de fácil comprensión, con evidencias de confiabilidad en pacientes con IC.

show abstract

Measuring Depressive Symptoms in Heart Failure: Validity and Reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire-8

Cited by 103 publications

References 23 publications

A comparison of depression prevalence estimates measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire with two administration modes: computer-assisted telephone interviewing versus computer-assisted personal interviewing

A comparison of depression prevalence estimates measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire with two administration modes: computer-assisted telephone interviewing versus computer-assisted personal interviewing

Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure

Impact of the disease: acceptability, ceiling and floor effects and reliability of an instrument on heart failure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About