BACKGROUND
Prior studies suggested that most patients with early stage breast cancer (BC) were willing, for modest survival benefits, to receive 6 months of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, an older regimen that is infrequently used today. We examined preferences regarding the survival benefit needed to justify 6 months of a contemporary chemotherapy regimen.
METHODS
E5103 was a phase III trial which randomized BC patients to receive standard adjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel with either bevacizumab or placebo. Serial surveys to assess quality of life were administered to patients enrolled between 01/01/2010 and 06/08/2010. Survival benefit needed to justify 6 months of chemotherapy by patients was collected at the 18 month assessment. A parallel survey was sent to physicians who had enrolled patients on the study.
RESULTS
Of 519 patients who had not withdrawn at a timepoint prior to 18 months, 87.8% responded to this survey. 175 (16%) physicians participated. We found considerable variation in patients’ preferences particularly for modest survival benefits: for 2 months of benefit, 57% would consider 6 months of chemotherapy, whereas 96% of patients would consider 6 months of chemotherapy for 24 months. Race and education were associated with choices. Physicians who responded were less likely to accept chemotherapy for modest benefit.
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients who received contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial, we found substantial variation in preferences regarding benefit worth undergoing chemotherapy. Differences between patients’ and physicians’ choices were also apparent. Eliciting preferences regarding risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy is critical.