1994
DOI: 10.1080/10400419409534509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring creative thinking: An activity‐based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the Department of Applied Social Studies of the City Polytechnic of Hong Kong carried out a study with the objective of determine the concurrent validity between activity-based measures of creative thinking and standard divergent thinking tests (Kitto, Lok, & Rudowicz, 1994). In order to do so, a sample of 30 fifth-grade children was chosen and five creative thinking abilities were measured using the behavioural techniques and the children's scores for fluency, flexibility, and originality were compared with those from the TTCT.…”
Section: Creativity As a Learning Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Department of Applied Social Studies of the City Polytechnic of Hong Kong carried out a study with the objective of determine the concurrent validity between activity-based measures of creative thinking and standard divergent thinking tests (Kitto, Lok, & Rudowicz, 1994). In order to do so, a sample of 30 fifth-grade children was chosen and five creative thinking abilities were measured using the behavioural techniques and the children's scores for fluency, flexibility, and originality were compared with those from the TTCT.…”
Section: Creativity As a Learning Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specific limitation of the previous research is that most studies used traditional divergent thinking tests (e.g., Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking) or insight problem‐solving tasks to measure creativity. Today, there is consensus among scholars that such instruments are tests of creative potential rather than real‐world creative performance (Cropley, ; Helson, ; Kitto, Lok, & Rudowicz, ) and, therefore, suffer from reduced validity, i.e., tasks do not resemble real‐world creative behavior (Cropley, ).…”
Section: Cross‐cultural Studies On Creative Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untuk menilai sejauh mana kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa, diperlukan indikator. Indikator dari kemampuan tersebut terdiri atas fluency yang menunjukkan banyaknya respons atau ide yang diberikan untuk menyelesaikan suatu masalah, flexibility yang menunjukkan kemampuan dalam melakukan penyesuaian pengetahuan atau keterampilan yang dimilikinya ke situasi yang baru, originality yang menunjukkan kemampuan dalam memberikan respons atau ide yang dibuat oleh kurang dari 10% dari jumlah siswa yang ada, dan sensitivity yang menunjukkan kemampuan dalam memprediksi konsekuensi yang mungkin ditimbulkan dari pengerjaan soal dan mendeteksi kesalahan (Kitto et al, 1994). Selain itu, ada versi lain terkait indikator dari kemampuan berpikir kreatif tersebut, di mana indikator sensitivity diganti dengan elaboration.…”
unclassified