Measuring couple relationship quality in a rural African population: Validation of a Couple Functionality Assessment Tool in Malawi

Abstract

Available data suggest that individual and family well-being are linked to the quality of women’s and men’s couple relationships, but few tools exist to assess couple relationship functioning in low- and middle-income countries. In response to this gap, Catholic Relief Services has developed a Couple Functionality Assessment Tool (CFAT) to capture valid and reliable data on various domains of relationship quality. This tool is designed to be used by interventions which aim to improve couple and family well-being as a means of measuring the effectiveness of these interventions, particularly related to couple relationship quality. We carried out a validation study of the CFAT among 401 married and cohabiting adults (203 women and 198 men) in rural Chikhwawa District, Malawi. Using psychometric scales, the CFAT addressed six domains of couple relationship quality (intimacy, partner support, sexual satisfaction, gender roles, decision-making, and communication and conflict management), and included questions on intimate partner violence. We used exploratory factor analysis to assess scale performance of each domain and produce a shortened Relationship Quality Index (RQI) composed of items from five relationship quality domains. This article reports the performance of the RQI. Internal reliability and validity of the RQI were found to be good. Regression analyses examined the relationship of the RQI to outcomes important to health and development: intra-household cooperation, positive health behaviors, intimate partner violence, and gender-equitable norms. We found many significant correlations between RQI scores and these couple- and family-level development issues. There is a need to further validate the tool with use in other populations as well as to continue to explore whether the observed linkages between couple functionality and development outcomes are causal relationships.

Impact of social capital, harassment of women and girls, and water and sanitation access on premature birth and low infant birth weight in India

“…First, it could indicate unmeasured benefits from support by one’s family in managing a shared latrine. Family-level support could reduce the likelihood of depressive symptoms in women, and therefore likelihood of PTB [ 57 , 58 ], or it could represent better marital relationships and better access to care [ 59 ] and a lower likelihood of domestic violence [ 60 ]. Second, women who relied on their community to resolve water problems may be an indicator of women living in communities with more water problems instead of an indicator of collective efficacy.…”

Re-conceptualising gender and power relations for sexual and reproductive health: contrasting narratives of tradition, unity, and rights

“…Previous work has found that unity was a key construct of power among young couples and a predictor of IPV and HIV-related health behaviours (Conroy 2014a;Conroy 2015;Conroy and Wong 2015). Similarly, previous research from Malawi found that shared decision-making was associated with positive relationship dynamics (e.g., intimacy, positive communication), whereas sole decision-making by women or men was associated with negative health behaviours and more IPV (Ruark, Chase et al 2017).…”

Prevalence and Correlates of Maternal Early Stimulation Behaviors during Pregnancy in Northern Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Survey

“…Mental health was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a common depression screener that has been validated for use among pregnant women in Ghana (25). The PHQ-9 has nine items that are summed for a score between 0 and 27 and standard categorization: minimal or no depression (score of 0 to 4), mild depression (5-9), moderate depression (10 to 14), moderately severe depression (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), and severe depression (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) (26). For analysis, we dichotomized the PHQ-9 into none to mild depression (score of less than 10) and moderate to extremely severe (score of 10 or greater), based on those who would have screened for no treatment or treatment in a clinical setting (25,27).…”