2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00243.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Continuity and Discontinuity Following Stroke

Abstract: Use of this instrument validated findings from a qualitative study, which showed that life following stroke was a paradoxical sense of both continuity and discontinuity in the experience of self. This instrument can be used to measure the effectiveness of nursing interventions aimed at increasing stroke survivors' sense of continuity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aftermath of ABI anxiety is of particular significance because anxiety has been identified as a significant predictor of functional outcome in brain injury survivors (Ponsford et al, 2008). In this context an individual’s perceptions of ‘Continuity of self,’ a concept originating in the nursing literature (Secrest and Zeller, 2003) is crucial to well-being (Haslam et al, 2008). Continuity of self can be understood as the experience of oneself in terms of one’s connection with others, and one’s wholeness or integrity of being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the aftermath of ABI anxiety is of particular significance because anxiety has been identified as a significant predictor of functional outcome in brain injury survivors (Ponsford et al, 2008). In this context an individual’s perceptions of ‘Continuity of self,’ a concept originating in the nursing literature (Secrest and Zeller, 2003) is crucial to well-being (Haslam et al, 2008). Continuity of self can be understood as the experience of oneself in terms of one’s connection with others, and one’s wholeness or integrity of being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuity of self can be understood as the experience of oneself in terms of one’s connection with others, and one’s wholeness or integrity of being. On the other hand, discontinuity of self can be thought of in terms of dependence, disconnection, and threatened integrity (Secrest and Zeller, 2003). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, only the discriminant validity could be assessed. The relative sparing of this dimension in stroke patients may result from internal adaptation and 'disability paradox' [14,17,35] . This phenomenon of disability disparity is not detected by the SF-36 in this sample and it may not be suitable for assessing internal adaptation and coping strategies in stroke patients.…”
Section: Face and Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the HRQOLISP-40 demonstrated good discriminant validity between stroke and control participants and good known-groups validity among different strata of stroke severity in both cities. As predicted, this was pronounced in the physical sphere in contradistinction to the relatively spared spiritual sphere, thereby illustrating disability disparity 13,41 and validating the a priori hypothesis. Such disparity has been reported in 339 Canadian stroke survivors and by Secrest, Clarke, and others.…”
Section: Construct Validity In Comparison To Controls and Other Measuresmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Such disparity has been reported in 339 Canadian stroke survivors and by Secrest, Clarke, and others. 11,41,42 This could also be related to the previously described "onion theory of happiness" 12 concerning the preservation of core life satisfaction in stroke patients. 12 The stability of the spiritual sphere in stroke patients may be advantageous if it could be modulated therapeutically to provide support, healing, and initiation of positive adjustments for the other aspects of life in order to maintain purposeful and meaningful life despite the strokeinduced physical impairment.…”
Section: Construct Validity In Comparison To Controls and Other Measuresmentioning
confidence: 89%