2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-019-00443-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring complexity of curves on surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a corollary of the lower bounds on self-intersection in Theorem 1.2, we prove that for "random" curves on a closed surface, the linear upper bounds on simple lifting degree from Arenas-Coto-Neumann [2] or from Aougab-Gaster-Patel-Sapir [1] in terms of intersection number can be improved to a square root upper bound: Corollary 1.6. When S is closed, there is some J ≥ 1 so that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a corollary of the lower bounds on self-intersection in Theorem 1.2, we prove that for "random" curves on a closed surface, the linear upper bounds on simple lifting degree from Arenas-Coto-Neumann [2] or from Aougab-Gaster-Patel-Sapir [1] in terms of intersection number can be improved to a square root upper bound: Corollary 1.6. When S is closed, there is some J ≥ 1 so that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One can still use π to pass between the ball of radius n in the punctured and closed surface groups, but a priori the fibers can have very different sizes, and perhaps a very large fiber sits over one of the very few curves in the closed surface with small self intersection. For this reason, we derive the P g statement of Theorem 1.2 from Theorem 1.3, using the work of Arenas-Coto-Neumann [2] as an intermediary (alternatively, one could also use the main theorem of [1]).…”
Section: Self-intersection Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations