2017
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Childhood Adversity in Life Course Cardiovascular Research: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The literature on childhood adversity and CVD would benefit from improving consistency of measurement, using weighted adversity composites, modeling adversity trajectories over time, and considering socioeconomic status as an antecedent factor instead of a component part of an adversity score. We suggest conceptual and analytic strategies to enhance, refine, and replicate the observed association between childhood adversity and CVD risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because childhood adversities tend to cluster together, measures of "cumulative adversity" are often derived as counts of events occurring during a specified time period (Atkinson et al, 2015;Evans, Li, & Whipple, 2013;Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O'Callaghan, & Najman, 2014;Turner & Lloyd, 1995), with greater numbers of events associated with greater severity of mental health problems (Björkenstam et al, 2017;Chapman et al, 2004;Edwards, Holden, Felitti, & Anda, 2003;Fergusson, Woodward, & Horwood, 2000;Mersky et al, 2013;Schilling et al, 2007). However, many studies of cumulative adversity rely on retrospective self-reports of childhood events and circumstances (Benjet et al, 2010;Lloyd & Turner, 2008;Whitesell et al, 2007), use simple counts of dichotomized items (Slopen, Koenen, & Kubzansky, 2014;Slopen, Kubzansky, McLaughlin, & Koenen, 2013), and fail to account for the timing or persistence of adversity throughout childhood (Appleton, Holdsworth, Ryan, & Tracy, 2017;Slopen et al, 2014) when examining its effects on health later in life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because childhood adversities tend to cluster together, measures of "cumulative adversity" are often derived as counts of events occurring during a specified time period (Atkinson et al, 2015;Evans, Li, & Whipple, 2013;Raposa, Hammen, Brennan, O'Callaghan, & Najman, 2014;Turner & Lloyd, 1995), with greater numbers of events associated with greater severity of mental health problems (Björkenstam et al, 2017;Chapman et al, 2004;Edwards, Holden, Felitti, & Anda, 2003;Fergusson, Woodward, & Horwood, 2000;Mersky et al, 2013;Schilling et al, 2007). However, many studies of cumulative adversity rely on retrospective self-reports of childhood events and circumstances (Benjet et al, 2010;Lloyd & Turner, 2008;Whitesell et al, 2007), use simple counts of dichotomized items (Slopen, Koenen, & Kubzansky, 2014;Slopen, Kubzansky, McLaughlin, & Koenen, 2013), and fail to account for the timing or persistence of adversity throughout childhood (Appleton, Holdsworth, Ryan, & Tracy, 2017;Slopen et al, 2014) when examining its effects on health later in life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding an abundance of literature describing models for a life-course approach and its value in health promotion, precise guidelines for its implementation and measurement could not be found and very few studies directly answered the synthesis question (35)(36)(37)(38). Of the 24 documents included in this report, some suggested validated measures as indicators for evaluating programmes focusing on a range of issues based on a life-course approach (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)49), and others indirectly indicated implementation of a life-course approach (18,30,34,(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are structured in three groups: conceptual frameworks; quantitative methods, including evaluation frameworks and indicator sets; and qualitative methods. The majority of studies were based on research in the United States of America (30,35,36,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44), followed by those based on policies and programme implementations in the United Kingdom (18,45), Australia (46) and international organizations such as WHO and the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (34,37,38,47-53).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations