Measuring Change Over Time in Socio-economic Deprivation and Health in an Urban Context: The Case Study of Genoa

Abstract

Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be selfarchived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com".

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the home: Can area characteristics identify at-risk communities in the Republic of Ireland?

“…It is influenced by the deprivation level of surrounding areas, highlighting the importance of using analytical methods that account for spatial autocorrelation [ 7 ]. Even when overall affluence increases, the relative association between deprivation and health inequalities remains [ 26 ].…”

Urban deprivation in Argentina: A POSET analysis

“…The deprivation concept has broadened the studies on poverty and inequality, fostering new research about the social and material inequality and its consequences. In general, each Argentinean urban area shows different levels of social and material deprivation, but, as seen in the last paragraph, areas particularly deprived from the material point of view may present low level of social deprivation, or vice versa (Landi et al, 2018; Mabughi & Selim, 2006; Testi & Ivaldi, 2009). This gives rise to interlaced realities, where we can find different combination between “material” and “social” (Landi et al, 2018).…”

“…In fact, some of them refer to social or economic conditions that are negative in an urban context, but not in a rural one (Bertin et al, 2014;Senior, Williams, & Higgs, 2002). Future works should concern the methodological and dynamic aspects of the indicators, to turn them into more and more helpful tools, go into the two domains (material and social) separately and expound the relation between them over time (Landi et al, 2018;Norman, 2010 Resumen. Argentina ofrece muchos ejemplos de una realidad urbana fragmentada, cuya precariedad podría ser analizada de manera beneficiosa mediante indicadores de precariedad, según una tendencia actual de la literatura.…”

“…In the last three decades, indicators of deprivation have been extensively developed in many countries as New Zealand (Salmond & Crampton, 2012); North America (Torsheim, Currie, & Boyce, 2004), the United States (Arcaya & Arcaya, 2015) and Canada (Pampalon, Hamel, & Gamache, 2009c). Several inquiries have shown that areas with lower deprivation report better health statuses, such as improvements in infant mortality and cancer survival rates (Basta et al, 2014; Norman, Gregory, Dorling, & Baker, 2008), while areas tackling persistent conditions of deprivation show the worst health and mortality outcome (Brown & Rees, 2006; Exeter, Boyle, & Norman, 2011; Landi, Ivaldi, & Testi, 2018; Norman, 2010).…”

The Dynamic Deprivation Index: measuring relative socio-economic deprivation in NZ on a monthly basis

“…In the UK methods to measure changes in small area socio-economic deprivation levels across census years have been developed (see for instance Norman (2010);Norman (2016);Norman & Darlington-Pollock (2017)). In Italy, Landi et al (2018) developed methods with a similar aim specific to the city of Genoa. However, all of the aforementioned studies are unable to say anything about the evolution of socio-economic deprivation between decennial census years.…”