2013
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring bluff erosion part 2: pairing aerial photographs and terrestrial laser scanning to create a watershed scale sediment budget

Abstract: Effectively managing and reducing high suspended sediment loads in rivers requires an understanding of the magnitude of major sediment sources as well as erosion and transport processes that deliver excess fine sediments to the channel network. The focus of this research is to determine the magnitude of erosion from tall bluffs, a primary sediment source in the 2880 km2 Le Sueur watershed, Minnesota, USA. We coupled analyses of seven decades of aerial photographs with four years of repeat terrestrial laser sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Slope and elevation error values were modified based on checkpoint data. Net change results for bluffs were compared to each other and also to the reported erosion rate measured by Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for one bluff from another study in the same area, 132 m 3 y −1 (TrB1 in Day et al, 2013b), which is not a perfect comparison because the time periods do not coincide exactly, but is a useful comparison nevertheless. Net change on the bluff using the chosen FIS was 223 m 3 y −1 which is higher than the TLS estimate (FIS 3 in Table 2).…”
Section: Digital Elevation Model Error Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slope and elevation error values were modified based on checkpoint data. Net change results for bluffs were compared to each other and also to the reported erosion rate measured by Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for one bluff from another study in the same area, 132 m 3 y −1 (TrB1 in Day et al, 2013b), which is not a perfect comparison because the time periods do not coincide exactly, but is a useful comparison nevertheless. Net change on the bluff using the chosen FIS was 223 m 3 y −1 which is higher than the TLS estimate (FIS 3 in Table 2).…”
Section: Digital Elevation Model Error Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected these basins for the following reasons: all are agricultural, to various degrees, primarily producing corn and soybeans; all are located mainly within the Central Lowland physiographic province and were affected by continental glaciation resulting in mostly flat, poorly drained uplands and incised river valleys (Arnold et al, 1999;Barnes, 1997;Belmont et al, 2011;Day et al, 2013;Gran et al, 2009;Groschen et al, 2000;Rosenberg et al, 2005;Stark et al, 1996); and all are characterized by a humid, temperate climate (Kottek et al, 2006 (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Areas: Large River Basins Of the Midwest With Varyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, trees' canopies may prevent the visibility of some riverbanks in the aerial photos. These problems might result in potential errors in the delineations of bank crests as well as the geo-rectification of aerial photographs [56].…”
Section: State Of the Art For Monitoring Bank Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%