Measuring and minimizing cybersickness in virtual reality

McHugh, Natalie

doi:10.26021/1316

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, guidelines exist that are intended to reduce the risk of simulator sickness such as field of view, duration, latency, acceleration, and navigation speed [54]. Simulator sickness is highly dependent on the duration of exposure, and experience in VR immersion and should be controlled without impacting adaptation to certain stimuli [55]. The results of the current study did not show any significant increases in simulator sickness following acute exposure to VR, which may be due to the acute and short-term immersion in the VR environment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Acute Exposure to Virtually Generated Slip Hazards during Overground Walking

Derby,

Conner,

Hull

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Postural instability and the inability to regain balance during slip-induced events are the leading causes of falls on the same level in occupational environments. Virtual reality (VR) provides the potential to be immersed in a realistic environment, exposing themselves to fall-risk hazards without the risk of injury real-world exposure may cause. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the lower extremity joint kinematics of the slipping leg during real and virtually generated slip hazards. A secondary purpose was to investigate dynamic postural stability following acute exposure to real (REAL) and virtual (VR) environmental conditions. A total of 14 healthy participants’ (7 men, 7 women; age: 23.46 ± 3.31 years; height: 173.85 ± 8.48 cm; mass: 82.19 ± 11.41 kg; shoe size (men’s): 9.03 ± 2.71) knee and ankle joint kinematics were compared during exposure to both REAL and VR environments. Participants then completed a series of Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) variations (standard, cognitive, manual) at the beginning and the end of exposure to each environment. TUG-C involved backwards counting and TUG-M involved walking with an anterior load. Environmental exposure was selected in a counterbalanced order to prevent an order effect. Knee and ankle joint kinematics were analyzed separately using a 2 × 3 repeated measure ANOVA to compare environments as well as gait types at an alpha level of 0.05. TUG variations were also analyzed separately using a 3 × 3 repeated-measures ANOVA to compare TUG variations and environment. No significant differences were observed for knee or ankle joint kinematics between environments or gait types. There were also no significant interactions between environments and gait types. However, significant differences were observed for TUG-C following VR environmental conditions (p = 0.027). Post hoc comparisons revealed significantly lower times for TUG-C following VR exposure (p = 0.029). No significance was observed for TUG-S or TUG-M. Current findings suggest the potential effectiveness of VR as a means of fall prevention training for occupational populations based on improved TUG-C and similar lower extremity joint kinematics in REAL and VR conditions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%