2008
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and Increasing Protein Solubility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
129
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis was validated by the analysis of the solubility-changing substitutions in proteins, which revealed that serine, together with glutamic acid and aspartic acid, contributes more favorably to protein solubility than other hydrophilic residues (asparagine, glutamine, threonine, lysine, and arginine). 95 …”
Section: Biological Significance Of Free Serinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis was validated by the analysis of the solubility-changing substitutions in proteins, which revealed that serine, together with glutamic acid and aspartic acid, contributes more favorably to protein solubility than other hydrophilic residues (asparagine, glutamine, threonine, lysine, and arginine). 95 …”
Section: Biological Significance Of Free Serinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These typical studies include antibody primary structure by chemical sequencing (Edman degradation) as well as peptide mapping by means of ESI-MS and MALDI-MS [26][27][28]; higher order structure by RP-HPLC-ESI-MS, Ellman's assay CD, FTIR, hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX)-MS and X-ray [28,29]; post-translational modifications (PTM) and charge variants by MSion-exchange chromatography (IEC), hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), capillary electrophoresis (CE) and isoelectric focusing (IEF) [30]; glycan profile and variants and size heterogeneity by HPLC-fluorescence, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), native gel, capillary electrophoresis, RP-HPLC-MS and native intact MS [31], as well as solubility measurement by ultrafiltration or PEG-induced precipitation methods [32,33]. Moreover, the immunogenicity should be evaluated for both antibody and ADCs [34,35], but unnecessary for SMs.…”
Section: General Differences Between Sms and Lms (Mab And Adc) In Admmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH dependence of the thermal unfolding of H2A-H2B and H3-H4 has been reported, although at lower ionic strengths. 41,42 Between pH 4.5 and 5.5, the mid-point of the thermal unfolding transition, T M , for the H3-H4 heterodimer was [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] C, depending on the protein concentration, while the T M of H2A-H2B was 10-15 C lower. Thus, H3-H4 is more stable, but forms fibrils much more readily than H2A-H2B or the individual H2A and H2B monomers which are only partially folded even under stabilizing conditions.…”
Section: Fibrillation Propensity Of Different Histonesmentioning
confidence: 99%