2006
DOI: 10.1080/09537280500285532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and benchmarking the innovativeness of SMEs: A three-dimensional fuzzy logic approach

Abstract: SMEs have been rather slow in adopting tools and techniques used in larger companies for improving their innovative performance, even if they are very well aware of the importance of innovation, due to difficulties in applying them in their practices. Furthermore, initiatives on improving the innovation within the SMEs in the past, have addressed ways of improving the product innovation process, through a wide spectrum of methods, techniques and tools without quantifying the degree of change of 'innovativeness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we said previously, some authors detected a positive relation between larger firms and innovation, because of improved access to human, financial resources and profit persistence (Bayona et al,2013;Karantininis et al, 2010;Laforet, 2008;Lin & Lin, 2012;Naranjo-Gil, 2009;Segarra & Arauzo, 2008;Hirch & Gschwandter, 2013;Triguero et al, 2013). On the contrary, other authors underline the ability of SMEs firms to innovate, based on their flexibility, interpersonal communication, etc (Bayona et al, 2001;;O'Regan et al, 2005;Maravelakis et al, 2006;Pla-Barber & Alegre, 2007;Alarcón & Sánchez, 2013). Some other authors do not detect relation between R&D and firm size (Pisano, 1990;PlaBarber &Alegre, 2007 andRobertson &Gatignon, 1998), so the impact of size on R&D is a question that needs further research, as it is undertaken in this paper.…”
Section: Determinants Of Randd Participationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As we said previously, some authors detected a positive relation between larger firms and innovation, because of improved access to human, financial resources and profit persistence (Bayona et al,2013;Karantininis et al, 2010;Laforet, 2008;Lin & Lin, 2012;Naranjo-Gil, 2009;Segarra & Arauzo, 2008;Hirch & Gschwandter, 2013;Triguero et al, 2013). On the contrary, other authors underline the ability of SMEs firms to innovate, based on their flexibility, interpersonal communication, etc (Bayona et al, 2001;;O'Regan et al, 2005;Maravelakis et al, 2006;Pla-Barber & Alegre, 2007;Alarcón & Sánchez, 2013). Some other authors do not detect relation between R&D and firm size (Pisano, 1990;PlaBarber &Alegre, 2007 andRobertson &Gatignon, 1998), so the impact of size on R&D is a question that needs further research, as it is undertaken in this paper.…”
Section: Determinants Of Randd Participationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, their ability to adopt tools and techniques that create innovation is much lower than in the case of large companies (Maravelakis et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar study has emphasized heavily upon process innovation that could result in product innovation and likewise product innovation which could force process innovation on manufacturing organisations. This further proves that there is a strong linkage of product and process innovation that should be considered as an important factor during the NPD process [13]. Finally, market innovation is considered as a newer approach which companies have been adopting in order to scale and utilise the target market.…”
Section: B New Product Development and Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%