Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom

Abstract

We compared students’ self-reported perception of learning with their actual learning under controlled conditions in large-enrollment introductory college physics courses taught using 1) active instruction (following best practices in the discipline) and 2) passive instruction (lectures by experienced and highly rated instructors). Both groups received identical class content and handouts, students were randomly assigned, and the instructor made no effort to persuade students of the benefit of either method. Students in active classrooms learned more (as would be expected based on prior research), but their perception of learning, while positive, was lower than that of their peers in passive environments. This suggests that attempts to evaluate instruction based on students’ perceptions of learning could inadvertently promote inferior (passive) pedagogical methods. For instance, a superstar lecturer could create such a positive feeling of learning that students would choose those lectures over active learning. Most importantly, these results suggest that when students experience the increased cognitive effort associated with active learning, they initially take that effort to signify poorer learning. That disconnect may have a detrimental effect on students’ motivation, engagement, and ability to self-regulate their own learning. Although students can, on their own, discover the increased value of being actively engaged during a semester-long course, their learning may be impaired during the initial part of the course. We discuss strategies that instructors can use, early in the semester, to improve students’ response to being actively engaged in the classroom.

Comparing Case‐Based with Team‐Based Learning: Dental Students’ Satisfaction, Level of Learning, and Resources Needed

“…Deslauriers et al. found that, in active learning, there was a negative correlation between students’ feelings about learning and their actual learning, with students feeling less positive about active learning strategies but performing better when compared to traditional lecture‐based instruction 18 . This reaction may require instructors to implement strategies that prime students for active learning in order to improve their initial response to these types of instructional methods.…”

Words of advice: preparing to teach

“…We also know that our students’ learning preferences are not always in the best interests of their academic development. Many students would rather choose lectures or videos of lectures over active learning sessions where they are expected to perform, but research shows that they learn better in the less preferred format . This is supported by research from educational psychology, which shows that ‘desirable difficulties’—activities or situations that challenge learners and slow them down—enhance the long‐term retention of material .…”

Merging Earth Science With Environmental Education for Teachers Through Inquiry, Constructivist and Place-Based Learning

“…A recent study at Harvard University (Deslauriers et al, 2019) discovered a negative correlation between learners' self-reported perception of learning with active learning (e.g. constructivist learning) and their actual learning.…”

“…A lower recognition of learning in active learning compared to passive learning (e.g. lecturing) was suggested as in part a result of increased cognitive effort required during the process (Deslauriers et al, 2019).…”