Measuring Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Area: A Case Study of Sukamantri Village in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia

Abstract

A village is an arena for sustainable development where economic, social, cultural, environmental and political interactions occur. It has a strategic meaning for the successful achievement of the 17 indicators of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, villages have limitations in providing data and indicators to measure the achievement of SDGs based on RW. The aims of this study are to provide Precision Village Data (DDP) and use it to measure and analyze the achievement indicators of 16 out of 17 village SDGs. One of SDGs 14, namely the marine ecosystem is not measured because the research location is a terrestrial village with an altitude of 423-902 m ASL. The use of DDP in the research location with normalization and aggregation methods based on arithmetic averages made this study successful in calculating the scores of each village SDGs. Then the results of the analysis of the village DDP and SDGs were combined with spatial mapping. The results showed that the SDGs in Sukamantri Village cumulatively achieved quite good results. A total of 3 SDGs was classified as very good, 4 SDGs were classified as good, 3 SDGs were classified as good enough, 5 SDGs were lacking, and 2 SDGs were poorest. Referring to the SDGs index calculation for Sukamantri Village, the environmental pillar has the highest score and is on average very good. However, the social and economic pillars are in the poor category, the law and governance pillars are in the poorest category. This means that sustainable development in Sukamantri Village has not been achieved. The natural wealth in Sukamantri Village has not been managed to achieve the fulfillment of basic human rights that are of a just and equal quality, for the well-being of the villagers and the realization of inclusive and quality economic growth.

Data Desa Presisi: A new method of rural data collection

“…The availability of accurate data is very important for planning and measuring the success of development programs [1] . Without precise data, various development problems occur and result in pseudo-development which results in not achieving development goals [2] . The data inaccuracy is caused by the institution that has the authority related to data collection using only one method, quantitative or qualitative [3] , [4] , [5] .…”

“…By using DDP, the contribution of GRI at the village level can be known, for example the GRI in Sibandang Village, North Tapanuli Regency is 0.39 [18] . These measurements aim to see the achievement of development programs that prosper the community and educate the nation's life [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] – 22] . However, the measurement of development will never reach its goal, if the data used as a reference for calculations is not accurate.…”

“…The inaccuracy of the rural data collection system in Indonesia has prompted us to formulate DDP as a new method of collecting rural data. This method is an inclusive approach that places the relationship between humans and technology to collect rural data by considering the spatial dimension, digital technology, citizen participation and census [1 , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] . The use of this method is to explore various parameters that are categorized into five aspects of people's welfare, including: clothing, food and housing (63 parameters); education and culture (8 parameters); health, employment and social security (72 parameters); social life, legal protection and human rights (27 parameters); and infrastructure and environment (15 parameters).…”

Re-Adaptation of COVID-19 Impact for Sustainable Improvement of Indonesian Villages' Social Resilience in the Digital Era

“…"Villages are encouraged to strengthen their development management mechanisms [52] in response to the rapid development of digital technology". The Indonesian government has proposed developing a sustainable development goal for the village development program [53]. The village is surviving because it has a resourceful village government apparatus capable of surviving and recovering from a crisis during an outbreak.…”

Analysis of Problems and Strategies for Improving the Socio-Economic Agriculture of Lubuk Kertang Village, Langkat Regency

“…The development strategy aims at sustainable development to increase equity in sectoral development and community performance, especially in rural areas (Hehamahua, 2015). The success of economic development is inseparable from the management of agriculture and village development (Sjaf et al, 2021). Because the village is a unified whole that describes the life of the community, the environment and social agriculture.…”